mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicted Futures Are Not Enough: Learning Executable Goals for Robot Manipulation

arXiv 2610.09309 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: World models → Embodied and robot world models

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative world models provide rich predictions of how manipulation scenes may evolve toward task objectives, yet those futures do not directly expose the compact task variables required by control. When training supervises future prediction alone, terminal goal accuracy is not an explicit learning objective, even when geometric recovery is available. We present Entity-Level Goal Readout, a learned prediction-to-execution interface that makes the executable terminal goal an explicit output of a 3D trace world model. It combines object-centric pose prediction with translation grounded in observed depth to produce a compact goal in SE(3). A shared Pose-Native Executor consumes this fixed goal with online object-pose feedback for closed-loop control without rerunning the world model. Across five manipulation tasks, the pipeline achieves a mean success rate of 79.69%. Goal diagnostics directly measure terminal goal accuracy, while controlled translation perturbations characterize how execution degrades under goal error. Zero-shot deployment on a Franka arm achieves 73.33% success on nominal StackCube, 66.67% with distractors, and 75.00% on PickPlate with a target unseen during policy training. These results support treating the prediction-to-execution interface as an explicit learned component of world-model planning rather than incidental post-processing in the control pipeline itself. Project page: https://claire0730.github.io/executable-goals/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026World Models for Robotic Manipulation: A Survey
  2. 2024Representing Positional Information in Generative World Models for Object Manipulation
  3. 2026DELE-w0.5: Inferring Action from Future Latent State for Robotic Manipulation
  4. 2026Say, Dream, and Act: Learning Video World Models for Instruction-Driven Robot Manipulation
  5. 2025Act2Goal: From World Model To General Goal-conditioned Policy
  6. 2026GE-Act 2.0: Pretraining and Scaling a World-Action Model for Robotic Manipulation
  7. 2026Rethinking World-Action Model for Compositional and In-Context Robotic Manipulation
  8. 2026DreamX-Phi 1.0: Action-Conditioned Video World Model for Robotic Manipulation