mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COMPASS: Finding Where Reasoning Lives in Language Models

arXiv 2610.07469 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning also fits: Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Explicitly eliciting reasoning substantially improves LLM performance. Existing approaches require a predefined characterization of reasoning, whether through CoT prompt design, contrastive CoT directions, or via SAE derived reasoning features. For mathematical reasoning with verifiable answers, we show that a much simpler signal suffices, which is the correctness of the model's own direct answer attempts. This signal yields a latent direction that elicits reasoning. This direction is decodable within the activations of most attention heads, but only a small subset of them can be effectively intervened. We introduce COMPASS, an inference-time steering method that identifies these heads using a logit-space attribution score and steers their activations along the correctness direction, requiring only per-head activation statistics. Across three model families and multiple math benchmarks, COMPASS outperforms the activation-steering baselines we compare against, improves GSM8K accuracy by 16 percentage points on average, and approaches CoT accuracy with 20-70% fewer generated tokens. Interventions transfer without re-fitting to unseen benchmarks, and ablations show that both the correctness direction and the small set of heads carrying it are necessary, with the effect concentrated in remarkably few heads.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Unspoken Hints: Accuracy Without Acknowledgement in LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Time
  3. 2025Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLM
  4. 2026Making LLMs Say What They Think: Measuring and Improving CoT-Interpretability Alignment
  5. 2025Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
  6. 2025The Challenge of Teaching Reasoning to LLMs Without RL or Distillation
  7. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  8. 2025Innate Reasoning is Not Enough: In-Context Learning Enhances Reasoning Large Language Models with Less Overthinking