mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation

arXiv 2510.09599 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities when provided with chain-of-thought exemplars, but curating large reasoning datasets remains laborious and resource-intensive. In this work, we introduce Prompting Test-Time Scaling (P-TTS), a simple yet effective inference-time data augmentation strategy for enhancing LLM reasoning through finetuning. Rather than collecting thousands or even millions of examples, P-TTS leverages a small pool of only 90 manually selected reasoning instances and systematically varies exemplar augmentation through principled instruction prompting intensities at test time to synthesize diverse reasoning trajectory contexts. Then we finetune the various sizes of Qwen-2.5 models on P-TTS data. Across a suite of mathematical reasoning AIME2024 & 25, MATH500, and GPQA-Diamond, our P-TTS-7B and 32B models outperform the prior competitive baselines like S1 and S1.1 (1K-shot), achieving absolute accuracy gains of +26.66% and +30.00% on AIME'24 (7B), and +13.34% and +6.67% on AIME'25 (7B); P-TTS-32B yields gains of +23.33% and +16.63% on AIME'24, and +26.63% and +3.33% on AIME'25 (vs. S1 and S1.1, respectively), with comparable or better performance on MATH500 and GPQA-Diamond. We further show that P-TTS enhances zero-shot generalization accuracy on out-of-domain reasoning benchmarks of Gaokao, Kaoyan, OlympiadBench, AMC23, GradeSchoolMath, and Minerva. Our analysis suggests that test-time scaling effectively explores the latent space of reasoning patterns, amplifying LLM problem-solving with minimal annotation overhead, and further unlocking the reasoning potential and capabilities of LLMs. Prompting Test-Time Scaling offers a practical, low-cost way to elicit LLM reasoning in resource-constrained or rapidly evolving domains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan

Other references · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  9. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  11. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  12. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
12 more
  1. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
  2. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  3. 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 287
  4. 2025d1: Scaling Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
  5. 2024Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 172
  6. 2025A Survey on Diffusion Language Modelscited by 75
  7. 2023Principled Instructions Are All You Need for Questioning LLaMA-1/2, GPT-3.5/4cited by 48
  8. 2020CoDA: Contrast-enhanced and Diversity-promoting Data Augmentation for Natural Language Understandingcited by 41
  9. 2022Submodularity In Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligencecited by 37
  10. 2025Learning to Reason via Mixture-of-Thought for Logical Reasoningcited by 20
  11. 2025ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoningcited by 17
  12. 2025BARE: Leveraging Base Language Models for Few-Shot Synthetic Data Generationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025From Long to Short: LLMs Excel at Trimming Own Reasoning Chains
  3. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
  4. 2025Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
  5. 2025Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinking
  6. 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
  7. 2026Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning
  8. 2025Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights