Dynamic Minimax Regret Optimization for Robust LLM Post-Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern LLM training increasingly relies on heterogeneous data sources spanning different domains, tasks, preference distributions, and difficulty levels. We study dynamic minimax regret for group-distributionally robust LLM post-training under instantaneous mini-batch-only bandit feedback. The framework views the training as a two-player sampler-optimizer process: a sampler adaptively selects among data sources using bandit feedback, while an optimizer updates the model parameters using stochastic gradients from the selected source. We focus on the practically restrictive setting where source losses evolve with model training but historical data are not re-evaluated, requiring the sampler to track instantaneous worst-sources from stale partial feedback. We propose DUCB-OGD, a simple and scalable algorithm that couples a Discounted Upper-Confidence-Bound sampler with an Online Gradient Descent optimizer. The sampler maintains exponential moving average loss estimates and confidence radii based on discounted effective sample sizes, avoiding costly re-evaluation of past data or intrusive changes to standard training pipelines. For K data sources and T training steps, we prove that DUCB-OGD achieves a dynamic minimax regret of tildeO(K1/4T3/4), which is optimal up to logarithmic factors for the undiscounted objective under our feedback model. Extensive experiments across supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning show that DUCB-OGD integrates seamlessly into modern LLM training pipelines and improves worst-group robustness with negligible computational overhead compared with standard sampling baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
22 of 68 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 229
- 2025ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoningcited by 201
- 2019On the Measure of Intelligencecited by 144
10 more
- 2025Self-Evolving Curriculum for LLM Reasoningcited by 112
- 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languagescited by 75
- 2022Near-Optimal Algorithms for Group Distributionally Robust Optimization and Beyondcited by 17
- 2025HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Taskscited by 17
- 2026Multi-Task GRPO: Reliable LLM Reasoning Across Taskscited by 14
- 2026Group Distributionally Robust Optimization-Driven Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 12
- 2025Seemingly Simple Planning Problems are Computationally Challenging: The Countdown Gamecited by 9
- 2025DynamixSFT: Dynamic Mixture Optimization of Instruction Tuning Collectionscited by 9
- 2025RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable Rewardscited by 8
- 2026mSFT: Addressing Dataset Mixtures Overfitting Heterogeneously in Multi-task SFTcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sample-efficient LLM Optimization with Reset Replay
- 2024Understanding Forgetting in LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning and Preference Learning -- A Convex Optimization Perspective
- 2026Rethinking Reinforcement fine-tuning of LLMs: A Multi-armed Bandit Learning Perspective
- 2024Robust Offline Policy Learning with Observational Data from Multiple Sources
- 2026Cross-Epoch Adaptive Rollout Optimization for RL Post-Training
- 2025Post-Training LLMs as Better Decision-Making Agents: A Regret-Minimization Approach
- 2023The Choice of Noninformative Priors for Thompson Sampling in Multiparameter Bandit Models
- 2026Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents