mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable Rewards

arXiv 2509.21319 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are the main RL paradigms used in LLM post-training, each offering distinct advantages. However, RLHF struggles with interpretability and reward hacking because it relies on human judgments that usually lack explicit criteria, whereas RLVR is limited in scope by its focus on correctness-based verifiers. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Binary Flexible Feedback (RLBFF), which combines the versatility of human-driven preferences with the precision of rule-based verification, enabling reward models to capture nuanced aspects of response quality beyond mere correctness. RLBFF extracts principles that can be answered in a binary fashion (e.g. accuracy of information: yes, or code readability: no) from natural language feedback. Such principles can then be used to ground Reward Model training as an entailment task (response satisfies or does not satisfy an arbitrary principle). We show that Reward Models trained in this manner can outperform Bradley-Terry models when matched for data and achieve top performance on RM-Bench (86.2%) and JudgeBench (81.4%, #1 on leaderboard as of September 24, 2025). Additionally, users can specify principles of interest at inference time to customize the focus of our reward models, in contrast to Bradley-Terry models. Finally, we present a fully open source recipe (including data) to align Qwen3-32B using RLBFF and our Reward Model, to match or exceed the performance of o3-mini and DeepSeek R1 on general alignment benchmarks of MT-Bench, WildBench, and Arena Hard v2 (at <5% of the inference cost). Models: https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/reward-models-10-2025

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models4 Jun
  2. 2025R3: Robust Rubric-Agnostic Reward Models19 May
  3. 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languages16 May
  4. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
  5. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style21 Oct
  6. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferences2 Oct
  7. 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models12 Jun
  8. 2024Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHF29 Jan

Other references · 13

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  4. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  5. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  6. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  7. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  8. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
  9. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
  10. 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 194
  11. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 108
  12. 2024LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Testscited by 33
1 more
  1. 2025HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Taskscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
  2. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  3. 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
  4. 2025Zero-Shot LLMs in Human-in-the-Loop RL: Replacing Human Feedback for Reward Shaping
  5. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF
  6. 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains
  7. 2024RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution
  8. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback