RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable Rewards
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are the main RL paradigms used in LLM post-training, each offering distinct advantages. However, RLHF struggles with interpretability and reward hacking because it relies on human judgments that usually lack explicit criteria, whereas RLVR is limited in scope by its focus on correctness-based verifiers. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Binary Flexible Feedback (RLBFF), which combines the versatility of human-driven preferences with the precision of rule-based verification, enabling reward models to capture nuanced aspects of response quality beyond mere correctness. RLBFF extracts principles that can be answered in a binary fashion (e.g. accuracy of information: yes, or code readability: no) from natural language feedback. Such principles can then be used to ground Reward Model training as an entailment task (response satisfies or does not satisfy an arbitrary principle). We show that Reward Models trained in this manner can outperform Bradley-Terry models when matched for data and achieve top performance on RM-Bench (86.2%) and JudgeBench (81.4%, #1 on leaderboard as of September 24, 2025). Additionally, users can specify principles of interest at inference time to customize the focus of our reward models, in contrast to Bradley-Terry models. Finally, we present a fully open source recipe (including data) to align Qwen3-32B using RLBFF and our Reward Model, to match or exceed the performance of o3-mini and DeepSeek R1 on general alignment benchmarks of MT-Bench, WildBench, and Arena Hard v2 (at <5% of the inference cost). Models: https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/reward-models-10-2025
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
21 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models4 Jun
- 2025R3: Robust Rubric-Agnostic Reward Models19 May
- 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languages16 May
- 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
- 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style21 Oct
- 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferences2 Oct
- 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models12 Jun
- 2024Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHF29 Jan
Other references · 13
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
- 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
- 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
- 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 194
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 108
- 2024LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Testscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2025Nemotron-Cascade: Scaling Cascaded Reinforcement Learning for General-Purpose Reasoning Modelscited by 48
- 2026Nemotron 3 Super: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Model for Agentic Reasoningcited by 38
- 2025Multi-Crit: Benchmarking Multimodal Judges on Pluralistic Criteria-Followingcited by 15
- 2026Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedbackcited by 11
- 2026Outcome Accuracy is Not Enough: Aligning the Reasoning Process of Reward Modelscited by 11
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Surveycited by 8
- 2026Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelinescited by 1
- 2026Dynamic Minimax Regret Optimization for Robust LLM Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Minimax Regret Optimization for Robust LLM Post-Training5 Oct 2026
- 2026Nemotron 3 Super: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Model for Agentic Reasoning14 Apr 2026
- 2026Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines7 Apr 2026
- 2026Outcome Accuracy is Not Enough: Aligning the Reasoning Process of Reward Models4 Feb 2026
- 2026Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedback12 Jan 2026
- 2025Nemotron-Cascade: Scaling Cascaded Reinforcement Learning for General-Purpose Reasoning Models15 Dec 2025
- 2025Multi-Crit: Benchmarking Multimodal Judges on Pluralistic Criteria-Following26 Nov 2025
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey2 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
- 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2025Zero-Shot LLMs in Human-in-the-Loop RL: Replacing Human Feedback for Reward Shaping
- 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains
- 2024RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback