Sampling Allocation of LinUCB: Optimal Design Limits in the Small-Gap Regime
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the sampling allocation of LinUCB in the small-gap regime, where the reward gaps are of order at most n-1/2 over the decision horizon n. This scaling captures the hard instances underlying worst-case regret lower bounds, for which LinUCB is known to be near optimal up to logarithmic factors in n. Using a mean-field perspective, we characterize this allocation through the empirical sampling distribution, a macroscopic object that averages the effect of adaptive decisions over the horizon, and identify its limit as n→∞. We establish that in this regime, the empirical sampling distribution induced by LinUCB converges to the set of D-optimal designs. This central result reveals that, in the small-gap regime, LinUCB not only achieves near optimal minimax regret but also allocates samples in a way that is asymptotically efficient for learning the reward parameter, thereby connecting regret-driven online learning with information-efficient experimental design. Building on the optimal design limit, we obtain two useful consequences. First, we refine the asymptotic regret analysis of LinUCB in the small-gap regime by characterizing its leading-order constant in the limit. Second, we show that, despite LinUCB's adaptive sampling strategy, the regularized least-squares estimator satisfies a central-limit-type theorem in the small-gap regime, thereby enabling valid statistical inference for the reward parameter.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 100
- 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 49
- 2021A Closer Look at the Worst-case Behavior of Multi-armed Bandit Algorithmscited by 30
- 2021Online Multi-Armed Bandits with Adaptive Inferencecited by 22
- 2021Weak Signal Asymptotics for Sequentially Randomized Experimentscited by 14
- 2022The Typical Behavior of Bandit Algorithmscited by 12
- 2024Inference with the Upper Confidence Bound Algorithmcited by 12
- 2025Stable Thompson Sampling: Valid Inference via Variance Inflationcited by 8
- 2021Risk and optimal policies in bandit experimentscited by 7
- 2025Statistical Inference under Adaptive Sampling with LinUCBcited by 7
- 2026Thompson sampling: Precise arm-pull dynamics and adaptive inferencecited by 6
- 2026A Diffusion Analysis of Policy Gradient for Stochastic Banditscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.