Global Communication or Graph-Specific Memory?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scalable Graph Transformers are commonly trained and evaluated on static large graphs in a transductive setup. Many scalable Graph Transformer components can be formulated as a constant-size shared memory, similar to virtual nodes, providing compressed information about the whole graph. The counterpart of these models in language models and other domains is justified as the input changes, and this mechanism learns to compress some useful information about the input. In transductive learning on a single fixed graph, however, any shared memory can be seen as a constant at test time. This raises the question of what exactly this shared memory does in this static setup. We give preliminary evidence that optimizing a shared memory directly performs similarly to global communication methods, and so normal local message-passing models can embed similar information in their weights. Thus, these settings may be a poor fit for evaluating global communication in graph neural networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
44 of 46 references.
References · 44
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,684
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,601
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
32 more
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
- 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 502
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 473
- 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 343
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 322
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
- 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 311
- 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 266
- 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 263
- 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 210
- 2019What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthcited by 201
- 2023Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphscited by 170
- 2019Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernelscited by 161
- 2024Graph-Mamba: Towards Long-Range Graph Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 134
- 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 133
- 2023DIFFormer: Scalable (Graph) Transformers Induced by Energy Constrained Diffusioncited by 87
- 2024Graph Mamba: Towards Learning on Graphs with State Space Modelscited by 86
- 2023Where Did the Gap Go? Reassessing the Long-Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 85
- 2024Classic GNNs are Strong Baselines: Reassessing GNNs for Node Classificationcited by 85
- 2023Attending to Graph Transformerscited by 83
- 2018Small ReLU networks are powerful memorizers: a tight analysis of memorization capacitycited by 78
- 2024Polynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Timecited by 65
- 2023On the Connection Between MPNN and Graph Transformercited by 61
- 2022The effect of smooth parametrizations on nonconvex optimization landscapescited by 21
- 2022How Much Does Attention Actually Attend? Questioning the Importance of Attention in Pretrained Transformerscited by 21
- 2025Towards Quantifying Long-Range Interactions in Graph Machine Learning: a Large Graph Dataset and a Measurementcited by 20
- 2024The Positivity of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 13
- 2024Even Sparser Graph Transformerscited by 13
- 2025On Measuring Long-Range Interactions in Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2024A Theory for Compressibility of Graph Transformers for Transductive Learningcited by 3
- 2024Rethinking Graph Transformer Architecture Design for Node Classificationcited by 2
- 2025GraphUniverse: Synthetic Graph Generation for Evaluating Inductive Generalizationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.