A Theory for Compressibility of Graph Transformers for Transductive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transductive tasks on graphs differ fundamentally from typical supervised machine learning tasks, as the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption does not hold among samples. Instead, all train/test/validation samples are present during training, making them more akin to a semi-supervised task. These differences make the analysis of the models substantially different from other models. Recently, Graph Transformers have significantly improved results on these datasets by overcoming long-range dependency problems. However, the quadratic complexity of full Transformers has driven the community to explore more efficient variants, such as those with sparser attention patterns. While the attention matrix has been extensively discussed, the hidden dimension or width of the network has received less attention. In this work, we establish some theoretical bounds on how and under what conditions the hidden dimension of these networks can be compressed. Our results apply to both sparse and dense variants of Graph Transformers.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.
Builds on
37 of 45 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,684
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
- 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
25 more
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
- 2015Image-based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutescited by 706
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 473
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
- 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 343
- 2021OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 329
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
- 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 288
- 2019Revisiting Graph Neural Networks: All We Have is Low-Pass Filterscited by 261
- 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 210
- 2019What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthcited by 201
- 2023Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphscited by 170
- 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 133
- 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 133
- 2023DIFFormer: Scalable (Graph) Transformers Induced by Energy Constrained Diffusioncited by 87
- 2023Attending to Graph Transformerscited by 83
- 2024Transformers, parallel computation, and logarithmic depthcited by 79
- 2024Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithmscited by 67
- 2024Polynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Timecited by 65
- 2022Graph Pooling for Graph Neural Networks: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 52
- 2021On the Expressive Power of Self-Attention Matricescited by 47
- 2017Active Regression via Linear-Sample Sparsificationcited by 36
- 2024Preventing Representational Rank Collapse in MPNNs by Splitting the Computational Graphcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.