Inductive Claims Extraction at Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A large part of political discourse on social media is built and expressed at a level of claims: i.e. declarative, typically single-clause statements, which convey a particular interpretation of reality and can range from factual to evaluative. Moreover, rather than occurring randomly, claims coalesce, recur in patterns, and come to be associated with different world views. When paired with structural computational tools such as Social Network Analysis, claims can be a powerful unit of analysis to study political phenomena such as echo chambers or polarisation. In this paper, we present a pipeline that uses a large language model (LLM) to inductively extract and catalogue claims from large social media corpora, and apply it to two different Twitter datasets: one relating to the 2020 US presidential election and the other to the 2022 FIFA World Cup. We comprehensively evaluate the approach by measuring the pipeline's recall and precision against manually annotated samples, run ablation studies isolating the contribution of its various components, and perform a qualitative error analysis. We discuss the value of the approach in the context of Computational Social Science research, and illustrate its capabilities by presenting the claims catalogue obtained from each dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.
Builds on
18 of 53 references.
References · 18
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
- 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 458
- 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 308
- 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 260
- 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 101
- 2023ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learningcited by 100
- 2023The science of fake newscited by 97
6 more
- 2023Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validationcited by 76
- 2025Large Language Model Hacking: Quantifying the Hidden Risks of Using LLMs for Text Annotationcited by 50
- 2024Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2017What is the Essence of a Claim? Cross-Domain Claim Identificationcited by 32
- 2023Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representationscited by 19
- 2024Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Modelscited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.