mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GFGE: Unifying Explainable AI Methods through an Interpretation Framework

arXiv 2610.05225 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) encompasses methods that draw on different sources of information and address different explanatory needs. A common framework is needed to describe how this information becomes evidence and is communicated as an explanation for a particular recipient. We propose the General Framework for Generating Explanations (GFGE), grounded in interpretative frameworks and the complementary activities of sense-reading and sense-giving. Its conceptual foundation is the Interpret/Explain Schema (IES), which connects an analyst's interpretation of system evidence, the communication of a selected account, and the recipient's interpretation of that account. GFGE operationalises this schema through five roles: data interpretation, model interpretation, output interpretation, optional post-hoc analysis, and aggregation. A role-typed operation graph records method-specific dependencies, while evidence records retain the sources, assumptions, and limitations of explanatory claims. The explanatory question, audience, and context guide the procedure. We instantiate GFGE for attribution, surrogate, counterfactual, concept and prototype, intrinsic rule, argumentation, and language-model methods. These instantiations show how intrinsic, post-hoc, and hybrid workflows can be represented through the same roles while preserving their distinct evidential requirements. GFGE provides a common basis for analysing explanation workflows, tracing communicated claims to their evidence, and identifying unresolved explanatory dependencies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

40 of 78 references.

References · 40

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  8. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  9. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  10. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  11. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  12. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
28 more
  1. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  2. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
  3. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
  4. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  5. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
  6. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 238
  7. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
  8. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
  9. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 214
  10. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  11. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 137
  12. 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 91
  13. 2014Falling Rule Listscited by 59
  14. 2024Reasoning Circuits in Language Models: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Syllogistic Inferencecited by 29
  15. 2019Generating Counterfactual and Contrastive Explanations using SHAPcited by 24
  16. 2024FaithLM: Towards Faithful Explanations for Large Language Modelscited by 19
  17. 2024Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making Skillscited by 14
  18. 2025FACE: Faithful Automatic Concept Extractioncited by 9
  19. 2025LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 5
  20. 2025V-CECE: Visual Counterfactual Explanations via Conceptual Editscited by 4
  21. 2026FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 4
  22. 2025On the Design and Evaluation of Human-centered Explainable AI Systems: A Systematic Review and Taxonomycited by 3
  23. 2025Improving Perturbation-based Explanations by Understanding the Role of Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 3
  24. 2026LIBERTy: A Causal Framework for Benchmarking Concept-Based Explanations of LLMs with Structural Counterfactualscited by 2
  25. 2026CHiRPE: A Step Towards Real-World Clinical NLP with Clinician-Oriented Model Explanationscited by 2
  26. 2025A New Approach to Backtracking Counterfactual Explanations: A Unified Causal Framework for Efficient Model Interpretabilitycited by 1
  27. 2025Findings of the BlackboxNLP 2025 Shared Task: Localizing Circuits and Causal Variables in Language Modelscited by 1
  28. 2025CAuSE: Decoding Multimodal Classifiers using Faithful Natural Language Explanationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.