mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LMBuild: Evaluating LLM Agents for Generating Buildable and Functional Structures

arXiv 2610.04292 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents also fits: Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents are increasingly capable of generating complex 3D structures, with the potential to reshape how objects are designed and realized in the physical world. Yet, producing elegant geometry is fundamentally different from producing objects that can be built and perform their intended functions. Existing evaluations largely focus on geometric quality while overlooking physical realizability. We introduce LMBuild, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on generating buildable and functional structures. LMBuild represents generated objects as assembled structures comprising part decompositions, joints, materials, and sequences. To support reproducible evaluation, we provide a unified framework consisting of: (1) an interactive environment in which agents can use tools to retrieve, create, and place components to construct objects; (2) a curated benchmark that repurposes established CAD datasets and augments them with knowledge from Wikipedia; and (3) a evaluation framework covering structural soundness, functional affordance, design quality, and physical realization. Evaluations across 30 systems reveal several intriguing findings: (a) Soundness and alignment are no longer the primary bottlenecks for frontier closed-source models, while functional affordance and physical operability remain substantially more challenging; (b) stronger models more effectively create new components, whereas weaker models tend to rely on retrieval; and (c) providing functional specifications substantially improves part completeness, kinematics, and physical operability. These results show that generating real-world structures requires deeper reasoning about functional affordances, mechanics, and designing and creating novel components. We expect LMBuild to provide a foundation for measuring progress and incentivizing research toward agents that generate buildable and functional structures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ArtiCAD: Articulated CAD Assembly Design via Multi-Agent Code Generation
  2. 2026How Far Are Vision-Language Models from Constructing the Real World? A Benchmark for Physical Generative Reasoning
  3. 2026Zero-to-CAD: Agentic Synthesis of Interpretable CAD Programs at Million-Scale Without Real Data
  4. 2025A Solver-Aided Hierarchical Language for LLM-Driven CAD Design
  5. 2026CADWorld: Computer-Use Benchmark for Long-Horizon Computer-Aided Design
  6. 2026Articraft: An Agentic System for Scalable Articulated 3D Asset Generation
  7. 2025LL3M: Large Language 3D Modelers
  8. 2026Physics-in-the-Loop: A Hybrid Agentic Architecture for Validated CAD Engineering Design