Scaling 3D Visual Grounding in Abdominal CT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual grounding models can enhance radiology workflows by linking report findings to image regions. This is particularly valuable for 3D CT, where findings often occupy a tiny fraction of the volume. Training 3D grounding models requires large sets of paired phrases and regions, and building such datasets is expensive, requiring radiologists to annotate images by hand. We posit that this supervision is already created implicitly during routine reporting, as radiologists frequently place 2D annotations (e.g., distance measurement, arrows) on key images to make measurements and to support report interpretation. We introduce an automated pipeline that converts these routine clinical annotations into large-scale phrase-region supervision for 3D visual grounding. The pipeline links each annotation to the corresponding finding in the report through metadata matching, then uses a promptable 3D segmentation model to convert the 2D annotation into a volumetric mask. This produces phrase-mask-volume datasets without requiring additional radiologist annotation. Applied to a single institution's clinical picture archiving and communication system (PACS), our approach generated 105K phrase-mask-volume triplets from 59K abdominal CT exams. We also introduce two abdominal CT grounding benchmarks, LocusBench-Onc and LocusBench-ED, which comprise 240 oncology and 260 emergency-department radiologist-reviewed phrase-mask-volume triplets, respectively, with the latter spanning 13 distinct categories such as appendicitis, hematoma, and hernia. We further introduce LocusCT, a 3D visual grounding model trained on this dataset, which achieves hit rates of 0.725 on LocusBench-Onc and 0.773 on LocusBench-ED, substantially outperforming comparator models. These results show that routine PACS annotations are a scalable, previously unused source of supervision for 3D visual grounding.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
- 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magiccited by 906
- 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
- 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
- 2018MAttNet: Modular Attention Network for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 431
- 2022Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision--Language Processingcited by 339
- 2024BiomedParse: a biomedical foundation model for image parsing of everything everywhere all at oncecited by 111
- 2024Merlin: A Computed Tomography Vision-Language Foundation Model and Datasetcited by 102
- 2023Large-Vocabulary Segmentation for Medical Images with Text Promptscited by 62
- 2025Pillar-0: A New Frontier for Radiology Foundation Modelscited by 25
- 2017DeepLesion: Automated Deep Mining, Categorization and Detection of Significant Radiology Image Findings using Large-Scale Clinical Lesion Annotationscited by 24
- 2025MIMO: A medical vision language model with visual referring multimodal input and pixel grounding multimodal outputcited by 15
4 more
- 2026MedMO: Grounding and Understanding Multimodal Large Language Model for Medical Imagescited by 15
- 2025Vision-Language Modeling in PET/CT for Visual Grounding of Positive Findingscited by 6
- 2026MedVL-SAM2: A unified 3D medical vision-language model for multimodal reasoning and prompt-driven segmentationcited by 5
- 2026Opportunistic Promptable Segmentation: Leveraging Routine Radiological Annotations to Guide 3D CT Lesion Segmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.