mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vision-Language Modeling in PET/CT for Visual Grounding of Positive Findings

arXiv 2502.00528 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models can connect the text description of an object to its specific location in an image through visual grounding. This has potential applications in enhanced radiology reporting. However, these models require large annotated image-text datasets, which are lacking for PET/CT. We developed an automated pipeline to generate weak labels linking PET/CT report descriptions to their image locations and used it to train a 3D vision-language visual grounding model. Our pipeline finds positive findings in PET/CT reports by identifying mentions of SUVmax and axial slice numbers. From 25,578 PET/CT exams, we extracted 11,356 sentence-label pairs. Using this data, we trained ConTEXTual Net 3D, which integrates text embeddings from a large language model with a 3D nnU-Net via token-level cross-attention. The model's performance was compared against LLMSeg, a 2.5D version of ConTEXTual Net, and two nuclear medicine physicians. The weak-labeling pipeline accurately identified lesion locations in 98% of cases (246/251), with 7.5% requiring boundary adjustments. ConTEXTual Net 3D achieved an F1 score of 0.80, outperforming LLMSeg (F1=0.22) and the 2.5D model (F1=0.53), though it underperformed both physicians (F1=0.94 and 0.91). The model achieved better performance on FDG (F1=0.78) and DCFPyL (F1=0.75) exams, while performance dropped on DOTATE (F1=0.58) and Fluciclovine (F1=0.66). The model performed consistently across lesion sizes but showed reduced accuracy on lesions with low uptake. Our novel weak labeling pipeline accurately produced an annotated dataset of PET/CT image-text pairs, facilitating the development of 3D visual grounding models. ConTEXTual Net 3D significantly outperformed other models but fell short of the performance of nuclear medicine physicians. Our study suggests that even larger datasets may be needed to close this performance gap.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2025.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Reality Check of Vision-Language Pre-training in Radiology: Have We Progressed Using Text?
  2. 2026Scalable Training of Spatially Grounded 2D Vision-Language Models for Radiology
  3. 2026A Unified Vision-Language Model for PSMA PET/CT Report Generation, Visual Question Answering, and Lesion Segmentation
  4. 2026Enhancing Fine-Grained Spatial Grounding in 3D CT Report Generation via Discriminative Guidance
  5. 2023Vision-Language Modelling For Radiological Imaging and Reports In The Low Data Regime
  6. 2025MedVista3D: Vision-Language Modeling for Reducing Diagnostic Errors in 3D CT Disease Detection, Understanding and Reporting
  7. 2026Generating Reports or Repeating Templates? Measuring and Mitigating Template Collapse in 3D CT Report Generation
  8. 2026Medical Image Spatial Grounding with Semantic Sampling