Counterfactual Generation via Flow Matching: Coupling-Sensitive End-to-End Rates
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual generation seeks to sample outcomes under a hypothetical intervention or decision using observational data collected under the factual assignment mechanism. We develop a flow-matching approach that combines a sample-split, doubly robust training objective with a learned coupling between observed source outcomes and target outcomes drawn from a fitted conditional outcome model. To enable finite-step generation, we leverage a score-corrected stochastic sampler based on a Gaussian-smoothed interpolation. Our main theoretical contribution is a coupling-sensitive KL bound for constant-step Euler discretization: the error is controlled by moments of the source--target displacement under the chosen coupling, rather than by global uniform regularity of the velocity field, and has near-linear dependence on the ambient dimension. We also establish finite-sample non-parametric guarantees for the learned velocity and score fields when both the conditional outcome model and the source-target coupling are estimated from data. These bounds separate approximation, coupling-replacement, nuisance-estimation, generalization, and Monte Carlo errors and, combined with the sampler analysis, yield an end-to-end guarantee for counterfactual generation. Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic image benchmarks support the coupling-dependent theory and show that, at finite discretization budgets, the stochastic sampler can outperform the corresponding deterministic ODE sampler.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
11 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Lipschitz regularity in Flow Matching and Diffusion Models: sharp sampling rates and functional inequalities7 Apr
- 2026Total Variation Rates for Riemannian Flow Matching5 Feb
- 2025On Flow Matching KL Divergence7 Nov
- 2025Elucidating Rectified Flow with Deterministic Sampler: Polynomial Discretization Complexity for Multi and One-step Models12 Aug
Other references · 7
- 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 87
- 2020Distribution Approximation and Statistical Estimation Guarantees of Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 23
- 2025Minimax Optimality of the Probability Flow ODE for Diffusion Modelscited by 23
- 2025Optimal Convergence Analysis of DDPM for General Distributionscited by 16
- 2025Sublinear iterations can suffice even for DDPMscited by 7
- 2025DoubleGen: Debiased Generative Modeling of Counterfactualscited by 6
- 2026Debiased Counterfactual Generation via Flow Matching from Observationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Flow Matching Posterior Sampling: A Training-free Conditional Generation for Flow Matching
- 2025Score-Regularized Joint Sampling with Importance Weights for Flow Matching
- 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers
- 2026One-Sided Quantile Coupling for Flow Matching
- 2025Counterfactual Identifiability via Dynamic Optimal Transport
- 2026Precise: SDE-Consistent Stochastic Sampling for RL Post-Training of Flow-Matching Models
- 2026Prediction--Loss Alignment for Sampler--Robust Flow Matching Training
- 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flows