Prediction--Loss Alignment for Sampler--Robust Flow Matching Training
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work has popularized a practical recipe in diffusion and flow matching: predict the clean signal x, convert it to a velocity, and train through a velocity-space loss. The conversion contains a singular endpoint amplification and therefore appears prone to unstable optimization, yet recent systems obtain strong empirical results with this recipe. We investigate this tension through the integrability of the pre-optimizer stochastic-gradient second moment. Under stated initialization conditions, the moment diverges under Uniform sampling; boundary-suppressing sampling can restore integrability under an additional upper-growth condition. We then show that prediction--loss alignment eliminates this conversion-induced source of non-integrability. Under a uniform moment bound, alignment yields a finite second moment for every timestep density, including Uniform sampling. Controlled experiments across continuous and binary settings reproduce the predicted sampler-dependent instability and show that aligned objectives remain trainable across the tested samplers. These results reconcile pointwise amplification with sampler-dependent empirical success and support alignment as a principled route to more robust flow-matching training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Variational Flow Matching for Graph Generation7 Jun
- 2024Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design7 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
Other references · 12
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 2,994
- 2021Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spacescited by 1,665
- 2023Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distributioncited by 712
- 2022Analog Bits: Generating Discrete Data using Diffusion Models with Self-Conditioningcited by 362
- 2023Understanding Diffusion Objectives as the ELBO with Simple Data Augmentationcited by 293
- 2023Efficient Diffusion Training via Min-SNR Weighting Strategycited by 242
- 2022Continuous diffusion for categorical datacited by 202
- 2025Soft Graph Transformer for MIMO Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Sharpen Your Flow: Sharpness-Aware Sampling for Flow Matching
- 2026Training-Free Refinement of Flow Matching with Divergence-based Sampling
- 2026Stable Velocity: A Variance Perspective on Flow Matching
- 2024Flow Matching Posterior Sampling: A Training-free Conditional Generation for Flow Matching
- 2026AREX: Affine-Residual Exponential Integrator for Few-Step Sampling in Flow Matching
- 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matching
- 2026Temporal Pair Consistency for Variance-Reduced Flow Matching
- 2025Score-Regularized Joint Sampling with Importance Weights for Flow Matching