mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PMosFM: Preconditioned Manifold Matching for One-Step Physics-Constrained Generation

arXiv 2609.40287 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-constrained generative models aim to generate physical fields that match a target distribution and satisfy prescribed constraints. However, enforcing these constraints often increases sampling costs through iterative corrections or training costs through residual optimization and trajectory unrolling. To address this issue, we introduce Preconditioned Manifold one-step Flow Matching (PMosFM), a preconditioned manifold matching framework for one-step physics-constrained generation. By encoding constraints in a manifold decoder, PMosFM learns transport in intrinsic coordinates without separate residual losses or terminal residual unrolling. A geometric preconditioner rescales coordinates using the decoder-induced metric, while a regularized covariance transform approximately whitens the interpolation-state inputs. A finite-interval objective couples velocity supervision with consistency between decoded endpoints in physical space. We show that exact parameterization removes residual-induced Gauss--Newton curvature, that geometric and covariance effects separate in a local conditioning bound, and that physical flow-map error bounds endpoint distributional error. Controlled ablations examine conditioning, and experiments evaluate optimizer-update time and memory footprint. At inference, PMosFM uses one neural transport evaluation followed by physical decoding. Experiments across benchmarks show lower training and sampling time than the multi-step baselines at comparable physical and distributional fidelity. Code and datasets will be released publicly.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

39 of 43 references.

References · 39

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  5. 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
  6. 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,416
  7. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  8. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 879
  9. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
  10. 2022Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraintscited by 508
  11. 2023InstaFlow: One Step is Enough for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generationcited by 395
  12. 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 391
27 more
  1. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
  2. 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 219
  3. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
  4. 2022A Physics-informed Diffusion Model for High-fidelity Flow Field Reconstructioncited by 152
  5. 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 145
  6. 2024D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generationcited by 122
  7. 2024DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving Under Partial Observationcited by 108
  8. 2024Physics-Informed Diffusion Modelscited by 90
  9. 2024Constrained Synthesis with Projected Diffusion Modelscited by 89
  10. 2020Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 81
  11. 2023Functional Flow Matchingcited by 67
  12. 2023Learning Physical Models that Can Respect Conservation Lawscited by 59
  13. 2023CoCoGen: Physically-Consistent and Conditioned Score-based Generative Models for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 56
  14. 2025Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraintscited by 52
  15. 2024ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 46
  16. 2024Gradient-Free Generation for Hard-Constrained Systemscited by 38
  17. 2022Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraintscited by 34
  18. 2020A probabilistic generative model for semi-supervised training of coarse-grained surrogates and enforcing physical constraints through virtual observablescited by 29
  19. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraintscited by 28
  20. 2026One-Step Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 24
  21. 2025SoFlow: Solution Flow Models for One-Step Generative Modelingcited by 13
  22. 2025Physics-Informed Distillation of Diffusion Models for PDE-Constrained Generationcited by 11
  23. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problemscited by 10
  24. 2025Chance-constrained Flow Matching for High-Fidelity Constraint-aware Generationcited by 7
  25. 2026Riemannian MeanFlow for One-Step Generation on Manifoldscited by 5
  26. 2026Preconditioned Flow Matchingcited by 2
  27. 2026The Right Measure for Physics-Constrained Generation: A Co-Area Correction for Posterior-Consistent PDE Inverse Problemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.