mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometry-physics confounding impairs PDE learning across varying domains

arXiv 2609.38623 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning partial differential equation (PDE) dynamics across varying domains is central to predictive modelling and data-driven discovery of governing equations. However, geometric variation alters both field representation and the governing differential operators, confounding geometric effects with intrinsic physical properties in the observed dynamics. This work identifies geometry-physics confounding as a unified failure mechanism for PDE learning across varying domains. In forward operator learning, this confounding increases the burden of inferring geometry-dependent operator changes from finite data, reducing data efficiency and generalisation. In equation discovery, omitting geometry-induced operators misspecifies the candidate library, leading to biased parameters, missed governing terms and spurious terms. We propose a de-confounding framework that makes the known geometry-to-operator transformation explicit. Geometry-induced coefficient fields improve prediction and data efficiency across five operator-learning benchmarks, while geometry-complete candidate libraries recover the generating equations and reduce held-out PDE residuals by more than two orders of magnitude in both evolving-domain systems. By separating known geometric action from intrinsic physics, the proposed framework supports more reliable and data-efficient PDE learning across scientific and engineering problems with varying geometries.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  4. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
  5. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  6. 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
  7. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 154
  8. 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 89
  9. 2023Operator Learning with Neural Fields: Tackling PDEs on General Geometriescited by 80
  10. 2021Encoding physics to learn reaction-diffusion processescited by 61
  11. 2025Geometry Aware Operator Transformer as an Efficient and Accurate Neural Surrogate for PDEs on Arbitrary Domainscited by 56
  12. 2023The transformative potential of machine learning for experiments in fluid mechanicscited by 26
7 more
  1. 2025RIGNO: A Graph-based framework for robust and accurate operator learning for PDEs on arbitrary domainscited by 22
  2. 2026Shape Derivative-Informed Neural Operators with Application to Risk-Averse Shape Optimizationcited by 5
  3. 2024Diffeomorphic Latent Neural Operators for Data-Efficient Learning of Solutions to Partial Differential Equationscited by 4
  4. 2023Multiphysics discovery with moving boundaries using Ensemble SINDy and Peridynamic Differential Operatorcited by 3
  5. 2026Shape-informed cardiac mechanics surrogates in data-scarce regimes via geometric encoding and generative augmentationcited by 2
  6. 2026Learning geometry-dependent lead-field operators for forward ECG modelingcited by 1
  7. 2026Neural Shape Operator Surrogates -- Expression Rate Boundscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.