Shape Derivative-Informed Neural Operators with Application to Risk-Averse Shape Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shape optimization under uncertainty (OUU) is computationally intensive for classical PDE-based methods due to the high cost of repeated sampling-based risk evaluation across many uncertainty realizations and varying geometries, while standard neural surrogates often fail to provide accurate and efficient sensitivities for optimization. We introduce Shape-DINO, a derivative-informed neural operator framework for learning PDE solution operators on families of varying geometries, with a particular focus on accelerating PDE-constrained shape OUU. Shape-DINOs encode geometric variability through diffeomorphic mappings to a fixed reference domain and employ a derivative-informed operator learning objective that jointly learns the PDE solution and its Fr'echet derivatives with respect to design variables and uncertain parameters, enabling accurate state predictions and reliable gradients for large-scale OUU. We establish a priori error bounds linking surrogate accuracy to optimization error and prove universal approximation results for multi-input reduced basis neural operators in suitable C1 norms. We demonstrate efficiency and scalability on three representative shape OUU problems, including boundary design for a Poisson equation and shape design governed by steady-state Navier-Stokes exterior flows in two and three dimensions. Across these examples, Shape-DINOs produce more reliable optimization results than operator surrogates trained without derivative information. In our examples, Shape-DINOs achieve 3-8 orders-of-magnitude speedups in state and gradient evaluations. Counting training data generation, Shape-DINOs reduce necessary PDE solves by 1-2 orders-of-magnitude compared to a strictly PDE-based approach for a single OUU problem. Moreover, Shape-DINO construction costs can be amortized across many objectives and risk measures, enabling large-scale shape OUU for complex systems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Performance of Neural and Polynomial Operator Surrogatescited by 5
- 2026Deep Hilbert--Galerkin Methods for Infinite-Dimensional PDEs and Optimal Controlcited by 2
- 2026Neural Shape Operator Surrogates -- Expression Rate Boundscited by 1
- 2026Universal Approximation of Nonlinear Operators and Their Derivativescited by 0
- 2026Geometry-physics confounding impairs PDE learning across varying domainscited by 0
- 2026Geometry-physics confounding impairs PDE learning across varying domains29 Sep 2026
- 2026Universal Approximation of Nonlinear Operators and Their Derivatives14 May 2026
- 2026Neural Shape Operator Surrogates -- Expression Rate Bounds20 Apr 2026
- 2026Performance of Neural and Polynomial Operator Surrogates1 Apr 2026
- 2026Deep Hilbert--Galerkin Methods for Infinite-Dimensional PDEs and Optimal Control19 Mar 2026