mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Team MSU GenText-Forensics Challenge 2026 Technical Report

arXiv 2609.38391 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Document text forgery has evolved beyond simple pixel-level manipulation: modern attacks alter not only the appearance of a document but also its meaning, and increasingly target the OCR & LLM pipelines that consume such documents. The ACM MM 2026 GenText-Forensics challenge therefore requires systems that not only decide whether a multilingual text image is forged, but also localize the point of manipulation, identify the attack type, and produce a human-readable forensic report with supporting evidence. We present our solution, a decomposed chain-of-thought (CoT) pipeline that combines a document tampering detector (DTD) with two Qwen3-VL-32B vision-language models, each LoRA-adapted to a distinct sub-task. DTD produces tampering probability maps that are converted into numbered candidate regions; a first model (the Filterer) validates these regions and assigns a preliminary forgery type, while a second model (the Semantic Detective) merges and re-grounds the surviving regions, searches for purely semantic anomalies that are invisible to pixel-level detectors, and writes the final report. Both models are trained by distilling chain-of-thought traces from a privileged Qwen3-VL-235B teacher that has access to ground-truth masks and reports. Our approach secured third place in the ACM MM 2026 GenText-Forensics challenge. We describe the data preparation, test-time augmentation, region rendering, distillation protocol, and training configuration in detail, and report ablations over detector thresholds, prompt designs, and pipeline decompositions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

4 of 15 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2025ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localizationcited by 22
  4. 2025LogicLens: Visual-Logical Co-Reasoning for Text-Centric Forgery Analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SEED: Simple ViT and Evolving Harness for Explainable Text Forgery Detection
  2. 2024TextSleuth: Towards Explainable Tampered Text Detection
  3. 2026From Sharp Eyes to Expert Mind: Internalizing Expert Knowledge in MLLMs for Tampered Text Detection
  4. 2026TextShield-R1: Reinforced Reasoning for Tampered Text Detection
  5. 2025Can GPT tell us why these images are synthesized? Empowering Multimodal Large Language Models for Forensics
  6. 2026Evidence-Guided Detection, Localization and Explanation for Text-Centric Image Forensics
  7. 2026Open-Set Visual Text Forensics via Sparse-Constraint Rectified Flow
  8. 2025Towards General Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detection(V2)