mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TextSleuth: Towards Explainable Tampered Text Detection

arXiv 2412.14816 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, tampered text detection has attracted increasing attention due to its essential role in information security. Although existing methods can detect the tampered text region, the interpretation of such detection remains unclear, making the prediction unreliable. To address this problem, we propose to explain the basis of tampered text detection with natural language via large multimodal models. To fill the data gap for this task, we propose a large-scale, comprehensive dataset, ETTD, which contains both pixel-level annotations for tampered text region and natural language annotations describing the anomaly of the tampered text. Multiple methods are employed to improve the quality of the proposed data. For example, elaborate queries are introduced to generate high-quality anomaly descriptions with GPT4o. A fused mask prompt is proposed to reduce confusion when querying GPT4o to generate anomaly descriptions. To automatically filter out low-quality annotations, we also propose to prompt GPT4o to recognize tampered texts before describing the anomaly, and to filter out the responses with low OCR accuracy. To further improve explainable tampered text detection, we propose a simple yet effective model called TextSleuth, which achieves improved fine-grained perception and cross-domain generalization by focusing on the suspected region, with a two-stage analysis paradigm and an auxiliary grounding prompt. Extensive experiments on both the ETTD dataset and the public dataset have verified the effectiveness of the proposed methods. In-depth analysis is also provided to inspire further research. Our dataset and code will be open-source.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

Builds on

1 of 35 references.

References · 1

  1. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Team MSU GenText-Forensics Challenge 2026 Technical Report
  2. 2026SEED: Simple ViT and Evolving Harness for Explainable Text Forgery Detection
  3. 2025Security and Detectability Analysis of Unicode Text Watermarking Methods against Large Language Models
  4. 2024DUPE: Detection Undermining via Prompt Engineering for Deepfake Text
  5. 2024FakeShield: Explainable Image Forgery Detection and Localization via Multi-modal Large Language Models
  6. 2025Can GPT tell us why these images are synthesized? Empowering Multimodal Large Language Models for Forensics
  7. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
  8. 2023Counter Turing Test CT^2: AI-Generated Text Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think -- Introducing AI Detectability Index