LogicLens: Visual-Logical Co-Reasoning for Text-Centric Forgery Analysis
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Sophisticated text-centric forgeries, fueled by rapid AIGC advancements, pose a significant threat to societal security and information authenticity. Current methods for text-centric forgery analysis are often limited to coarse-grained visual analysis and lack the capacity for sophisticated reasoning. Moreover, they typically treat detection, grounding, and explanation as discrete sub-tasks, overlooking their intrinsic relationships for holistic performance enhancement. To address these challenges, we introduce LogicLens, a unified framework for Visual-Textual Co-reasoning that reformulates these objectives into a joint task. The deep reasoning of LogicLens is powered by our novel Cross-Cues-aware Chain of Thought (CCT) mechanism, which iteratively cross-validates visual cues against textual logic. To ensure robust alignment across all tasks, we further propose a weighted multi-task reward function for GRPO-based optimization. Complementing this framework, we first designed the PR2 (Perceiver, Reasoner, Reviewer) pipeline, a hierarchical and iterative multi-agent system that generates high-quality, cognitively-aligned annotations. Then, we constructed RealText, a diverse dataset comprising 5,397 images with fine-grained annotations, including textual explanations, pixel-level segmentation, and authenticity labels for model training. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of LogicLens across multiple benchmarks. In a zero-shot evaluation on T-IC13, it surpasses the specialized framework by 41.4% and GPT-4o by 23.4% in macro-average F1 score. Moreover, on the challenging dense-text T-SROIE dataset, it establishes a significant lead over other MLLM-based methods in mF1, CSS, and the macro-average F1. Our dataset, model, and code will be made publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2025.
Builds on
7 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 718
- 2024GeoWizard: Unleashing the Diffusion Priors for 3D Geometry Estimation from a Single Imagecited by 283
- 2024TextSleuth: Towards Explainable Tampered Text Detectioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DocShield: Towards AI Document Safety via Evidence-Grounded Agentic Reasoning
- 2025Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning
- 2026ForgeryVCR: Visual-Centric Reasoning via Efficient Forensic Tools in MLLMs for Image Forgery Detection and Localization
- 2025REVEAL -- Reasoning and Evaluation of Visual Evidence through Aligned Language
- 2026ReAlign: Generalizable Image Forgery Detection via Reasoning-Aligned Representation
- 2024A Hitchhikers Guide to Fine-Grained Face Forgery Detection Using Common Sense Reasoning
- 2026Agentic Tool-Augmented Reasoning for Explainable Image Forgery Detection
- 2025FORGE: Forensic Reasoning with Grounded Evidence