mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EasyPPO: Stabilizing the Critic Is Key

arXiv 2609.36802 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A key strength of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is its learned critic, which uses historical trajectories collected during reinforcement learning to estimate expected returns and reduce policy-gradient variance. However, we find that the critic is also a major source of instability in reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs). We identify two critic failure modes that destabilize PPO. First, filtering truncated rollouts from both actor and critic shifts the policy objective to reward conditioned on completion, allowing truncation to increase even as conditional reward improves. Second, heterogeneous return noise can cause high-variance prompts to dominate critic updates in finite batches. We introduce EasyPPO to address these failures. Actor-only overlong filtering trains the critic on returns from both completed and truncated rollouts. Noise-normalized critic regression weights each prompt's critic loss by the inverse standard deviation of its sampled returns, balancing noise contributions across prompts. Moderately smaller critic mini-batches confine outlier influence to fewer rollouts during gradient clipping. Across continuous-reward coding on FrontierCS, binary-reward mathematical reasoning on AIME24, and multi-turn search on Search-R1, EasyPPO remains stable throughout the full training horizon and consistently outperforms vanilla PPO, VAPO, and HL-Gauss PPO. Its best validation scores show relative gains of 14.89%, 2.28%, and 9.47% over PPO, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

33 of 41 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  7. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  8. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
  9. 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Taskscited by 285
  10. 2025REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalizationcited by 241
  11. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 200
  12. 2018Multi-task Deep Reinforcement Learning with PopArtcited by 141
21 more
  1. 2022On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networkscited by 120
  2. 2025What's Behind PPO's Collapse in Long-CoT? Value Optimization Holds the Secretcited by 98
  3. 2016Learning values across many orders of magnitudecited by 85
  4. 2025JustRL: Scaling a 1.5B LLM with a Simple RL Recipecited by 64
  5. 2025Nemotron-Cascade: Scaling Cascaded Reinforcement Learning for General-Purpose Reasoning Modelscited by 48
  6. 2022Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Uncertainty Estimationcited by 27
  7. 2026FlashInfer-Bench: Building the Virtuous Cycle for AI-driven LLM Systemscited by 25
  8. 2025FrontierCS: Evolving Challenges for Evolving Intelligencecited by 23
  9. 2026EdgeBench: Unveiling Scaling Laws of Learning from Real-World Environmentscited by 20
  10. 2026MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AIcited by 17
  11. 2026AutoLab: Can Frontier Models Solve Long-Horizon Auto Research and Engineering Tasks?cited by 13
  12. 2026EVPO: Explained Variance Policy Optimization for Adaptive Critic Utilization in LLM Post-Trainingcited by 6
  13. 2026FrontierOR: Benchmarking LLMs' Capacity for Efficient Algorithm Design in Large-Scale Optimizationcited by 6
  14. 2026Evolution Fine-Tuning: Learning to Discover Across 371 Optimization Taskscited by 6
  15. 2023Regularization and Variance-Weighted Regression Achieves Minimax Optimality in Linear MDPs: Theory and Practicecited by 4
  16. 2026Best Practice Critic Optimizationcited by 4
  17. 2026FrontierSmith: Synthesizing Open-Ended Coding Problems at Scalecited by 3
  18. 2026Start Classifying: Categorical Critics for LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  19. 2026Tail-Likelihood Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  20. 2026When Do Larger Batches Help Scale LLM Reinforcement Learning?cited by 2
  21. 2026Rethinking Critic Learning in PPO: Understanding and Mitigating Value Flatteningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
  2. 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping
  3. 2026Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026TOPPO: Rethinking PPO for Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Critic Balancing
  5. 2025A-3PO: Accelerating Asynchronous LLM Training with Staleness-aware Proximal Policy Approximation
  6. 2026Stabilizing Policy Optimization via Logits Convexity
  7. 2026Training Language Models to Fail Gracefully
  8. 2026A Step Back: Prefix Importance Ratio Stabilizes Policy Optimization