mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inducing Process Supervision from Outcome-Only Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2609.36641 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Process reward models (PRMs) have become a key component for LLMs, as their step-level feedback supports both post-training and test-time reasoning. However, training strong PRMs remains costly: human step annotation is difficult to scale, while Monte Carlo estimation is computationally expensive and can drift from the intrinsic correctness of steps. To get effective PRMs at low cost, we introduce TIPS (Thinking-Induced Process Supervision), an outcome-only reinforcement learning (RL) framework for training generative PRMs. In TIPS, the model generates a chain-of-thought (CoT) followed by step-level labels and an outcome label. The reward depends solely on whether the predicted outcome matches the ground truth, and the resulting group-relative advantage is used to optimize the entire generated response. Intuitively, when checking intermediate steps helps determine the outcome, more accurate checks can lead to better outcome judgments and higher rewards. Outcome-only RL can therefore reinforce step-level verification without explicit process supervision. We validate the effectiveness of TIPS across math and agent benchmarks and four backbone families. Notably, TIPS-Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 reaches 85.2 F1 on ProcessBench with only 3.2K outcome-labeled trajectories, surpassing all evaluated trained PRMs and strong prompt-only judges such as GPT-5.4-Instruct and Claude-4.7-Opus, while still trailing o1-mini. Code and data are available at https://github.com/RUCBM/TIPS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SCAN: Self-Denoising Monte Carlo Annotation for Robust Process Reward Learning20 Sep
  2. 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scaling25 Jun
  3. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning5 May
  4. 2025Process Reward Models That Think23 Apr
  5. 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoning1 Apr
  6. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
  7. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  8. 2025AURORA:Automated Training Framework of Universal Process Reward Models via Ensemble Prompting and Reverse Verification17 Feb
  9. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
  10. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
  11. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning9 Dec
  12. 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labels2 Dec
4 more
  1. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  2. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  8. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  9. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  10. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  11. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  12. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
13 more
  1. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  2. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
  3. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  4. 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problemscited by 260
  5. 2025ToRL: Scaling Tool-Integrated RLcited by 169
  6. 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
  7. 2025J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  8. 2025MiniCPM4: Ultra-Efficient LLMs on End Devicescited by 52
  9. 2024RLCoder: Reinforcement Learning for Repository-Level Code Completioncited by 44
  10. 2026AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agentscited by 31
  11. 2024AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifiercited by 30
  12. 2026AgentCPM-Explore: Realizing Long-Horizon Deep Exploration for Edge-Scale Agentscited by 12
  13. 2026DARC: Decoupled Asymmetric Reasoning Curriculum for LLM Evolutioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation
  2. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning
  3. 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
  4. 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models
  5. 2025Good Learners Think Their Thinking: Generative PRM Makes Large Reasoning Model More Efficient Math Learner
  6. 2025StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning
  7. 2026Internalizing Outcome Supervision into Process Supervision: A New Paradigm for Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning
  8. 2026Reward Granularity in RLVR: Comparing Process and Outcome Reward Structures for Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models