Internalizing Outcome Supervision into Process Supervision: A New Paradigm for Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
The central challenge of reinforcement learning for reasoning lies not only in the sparsity of outcome-level supervision, but more fundamentally in how to transform feedback provided only at the end of a sequence into fine-grained learning signals that can guide intermediate reasoning steps. Existing approaches either rely on outcome-level rewards for sequence-level optimization, which makes precise credit assignment difficult, or depend on externally constructed process supervision, which is costly and difficult to scale sustainably. To address this, we propose a new perspective: reinforcement learning for reasoning can be understood as the problem of internalizing outcome supervision into process supervision. From this perspective, we introduce a supervision-internalization method for reinforcement learning for reasoning, enabling the model to automatically extract process-level learning signals through identifying, correcting, and reusing failed reasoning trajectories, thereby achieving finer-grained policy optimization under outcome-only supervision. We further abstract this idea into a new training paradigm, in which the model continually generates and refines its own internal process supervision during reinforcement learning, opening a new path for fine-grained credit assignment in reinforcement learning for reasoning that differs from externally provided process supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.
Builds on
23 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ATTNPO: Attention-Guided Process Supervision for Efficient Reasoning10 Feb
- 2026Learning from the Irrecoverable: Error-Localized Policy Optimization for Tool-Integrated LLM Reasoning10 Feb
- 2026Save the Good Prefix: Precise Error Penalization via Process-Supervised RL to Enhance LLM Reasoning26 Jan
- 2026Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoning23 Jan
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs17 Jun
- 2025Process Reward Models That Think23 Apr
- 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning15 Apr
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
- 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learning7 Mar
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
2 more
Other references · 9
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 426
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
- 2025OpenCodeReasoning: Advancing Data Distillation for Competitive Codingcited by 113
- 2025Self-rewarding correction for mathematical reasoningcited by 70
- 2025ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verificationcited by 35
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Do We Need to Verify Step by Step? Rethinking Process Supervision from a Theoretical Perspective
- 2026Reconciling Process Supervision with Outcome-Based Credit in Agentic Policy Optimization
- 2026Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation
- 2026Inducing Process Supervision from Outcome-Only Reinforcement Learning
- 2026InT: Self-Proposed Interventions Enable Credit Assignment in LLM Reasoning
- 2026OPID: On-Policy Skill Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Reward Granularity in RLVR: Comparing Process and Outcome Reward Structures for Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models
- 2026C3: Rethinking Process Supervision via Confidence-Guided Credit Correction in Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning