From internal representations to model improvement through prediction errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With limited annotation budgets, choosing which images to label determines how much a model improves. Data-selection methods that use features from a separately trained model, or scene descriptions written by vision-language models, have been successful, but those signals do not directly capture changes in the model being improved. The target model's own internal features reflect what it has learned so far and change with retraining, making them a natural cue for choosing the next training data. However, feature rarity alone does not reveal the errors that matter for performance. Here we link internal features to prediction errors and their expected impact on performance and select images for labeling and retraining without using labels for candidate images. We evaluated the method with an object detector on two datasets and two pairs of random seeds. Adding internal features improved the identification of prediction errors in 15 of 16 conditions. When performance was averaged over successive labeling rounds, the method outperformed selection based only on feature rarity in all four evaluation settings and ranked among the top two of six methods. With other conditions held fixed, performance after retraining was again higher than with rarity-based selection, even though the latter collected more errors. With longer retraining, the proposed method ranked first among six methods. These results suggest that linking a model's internal features to its errors and their effects on performance may help select training images that improve performance, thereby allowing the model's current state to guide which images are labeled next.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
- 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 131
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
- 2020TIDE: A General Toolbox for Identifying Object Detection Errorscited by 113
11 more
- 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
- 2021Active Learning for Deep Object Detection via Probabilistic Modelingcited by 79
- 2022Active Learning Through a Covering Lenscited by 62
- 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2022Entropy-based Active Learning for Object Detection with Progressive Diversity Constraintcited by 53
- 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
- 2021Consistency-based Active Learning for Object Detectioncited by 32
- 2022Plug and Play Active Learning for Object Detectioncited by 28
- 2024AIDE: An Automatic Data Engine for Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 26
- 2020MetaDetect: Uncertainty Quantification and Prediction Quality Estimates for Object Detectioncited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story
- 2026The Blending Ratio Is Not Where the Performance Is: Diagnosing Prototype Blending for Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
- 2025Learning What Matters: Prioritized Concept Learning via Relative Error-driven Sample Selection
- 2025TRoVe: Discovering Error-Inducing Static Feature Biases in Temporal Vision-Language Models
- 2026Multimodal Large Language Models as Image Classifiers
- 2024What Makes Good Few-shot Examples for Vision-Language Models?
- 2025Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation
- 2025Synthetic Stimuli, Real Gains: Rethinking VLM Fine-Tuning Through Fully Controlled Data Generation