mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRoVe: Discovering Error-Inducing Static Feature Biases in Temporal Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2512.01048 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) have made great strides in addressing temporal understanding tasks, which involve characterizing visual changes across a sequence of images. However, recent works have suggested that when making predictions, VLMs may rely on static feature biases, such as background or object features, rather than dynamic visual changes. Static feature biases are a type of shortcut and can contribute to systematic prediction errors on downstream tasks; as a result, identifying and characterizing error-inducing static feature biases is critical prior to real-world model deployment. In this work, we introduce TRoVe, an automated approach for discovering error-inducing static feature biases learned by temporal VLMs. Given a trained VLM and an annotated validation dataset associated with a downstream classification task, TRoVe extracts candidate static features from the dataset and scores each feature by (i) the effect of the feature on classification errors as well as (ii) the extent to which the VLM relies on the feature when making predictions. In order to quantitatively evaluate TRoVe, we introduce an evaluation framework consisting of 101 trained temporal VLMs paired with ground-truth annotations for learned static feature biases. We use this framework to demonstrate that TRoVe can accurately identify error-inducing static feature biases in VLMs, achieving a 28.6% improvement over the closest baseline. Finally, we apply TRoVe to 7 off-the-shelf VLMs and 2 temporal understanding tasks, surfacing previously-unknown static feature biases and demonstrating that knowledge of learned biases can aid in improving model performance at test time. Our code is available at https://github.com/Stanford-AIMI/TRoVe.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2025.

Builds on

41 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024RaVL: Discovering and Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Fine-Tuned Vision-Language Models6 Nov
  2. 2023ViLLA: Fine-Grained Vision-Language Representation Learning from Real-World Data22 Aug

Other references · 39

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  9. 2023Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understandingcited by 1,461
  10. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  11. 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
  12. 2023InternVid: A Large-scale Video-Text Dataset for Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 488
27 more
  1. 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 352
  2. 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 335
  3. 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 331
  4. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
  5. 2022Expanding Language-Image Pretrained Models for General Video Recognitioncited by 320
  6. 2024InternVideo2: Scaling Foundation Models for Multimodal Video Understandingcited by 310
  7. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
  8. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 215
  9. 2023Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processingcited by 210
  10. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
  11. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  12. 2022Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understandingcited by 167
  13. 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
  14. 2022Revealing Single Frame Bias for Video-and-Language Learningcited by 131
  15. 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
  16. 2022Distilling Model Failures as Directions in Latent Spacecited by 82
  17. 2022MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflictscited by 81
  18. 2020Removing the Background by Adding the Background: Towards Background Robust Self-supervised Video Representation Learningcited by 66
  19. 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
  20. 2023Discovering and Mitigating Visual Biases through Keyword Explanationcited by 58
  21. 2023Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Multi-modal Models during Fine-tuningcited by 47
  22. 2021Motion-aware Contrastive Video Representation Learning via Foreground-background Mergingcited by 45
  23. 2024VideoCLIP-XL: Advancing Long Description Understanding for Video CLIP Modelscited by 40
  24. 2022Mitigating and Evaluating Static Bias of Action Representations in the Background and the Foregroundcited by 26
  25. 2023Where Does My Model Underperform? A Human Evaluation of Slice Discovery Algorithmscited by 9
  26. 2024DISCERN: Decoding Systematic Errors in Natural Language for Text Classifierscited by 8
  27. 2025Learning to Generalize without Bias for Open-Vocabulary Action Recognitioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026V-DyKnow: A Dynamic Benchmark for Time-Sensitive Knowledge in Vision Language Models
  2. 2026Scaling Vision-Language Models Is Not Enough to Mitigate Bias
  3. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  4. 2026DatBench: Discriminative, Faithful, and Efficient VLM Evaluations
  5. 2026What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation
  7. 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models
  8. 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models