EmailBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Enterprise Email and Productivity Tasks
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise email agents must combine information retrieval, structured state changes, temporal reasoning, and multi-step coordination. Recent agent benchmarks include productivity tasks, but few center on typed email workflows in a self-contained environment. We introduce EmailBench, a benchmark of 206 email and productivity scenarios across 16 task categories. The benchmark couples a typed email API specification with provider-neutral naming, a deterministic synthetic Enron-inspired corpus, and a scenario suite whose topic selection was informed by aggregate task-intent telemetry from an interactive prototype. Its hybrid evaluation protocol combines 258 executable static assertions with 211 LLM rubrics. We evaluate eight LM configurations on a fixed single-user corpus. The best-performing configuration passes only 33.5% of scenarios despite 99.7% of its tool calls completing without an observed API failure, with pass rates varying substantially across task categories. This gap shows that valid tool execution is not equivalent to task completion. EmailBench provides a self-contained environment for end-to-end email-agent evaluation, with broader tool coverage, multi-persona testing, and repeated-run evaluation as future work areas.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 24 references.
References · 14
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401
- 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 158
- 2024OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automationcited by 70
- 2025OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflowscited by 57
- 2026ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspacescited by 33
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Lost in the Request: How Communication Variation Disrupts Retrieval and Action in Email Agents
- 2026ClawMark: A Living-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn, Multi-Day, Multimodal Coworker Agents
- 2026AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling
- 2026OmegaUse-OfficeVal: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Office-Suite Tasks with Economic Grounding
- 2024WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Setting
- 2026E-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Step Tool-Use Agents in Real-World Product Scenarios
- 2025The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution
- 2026FireBench: Evaluating Instruction Following in Enterprise and API-Driven LLM Applications