mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PrivDrift: Auditing User-Secret Leakage Under Topic Drift in Active LLM Conversations

arXiv 2609.30094 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models increasingly operate as persistent assistants in user-facing, shared-session, and tool-augmented settings. When users disclose sensitive information during an active conversation, that information may remain behaviorally recoverable through later prompts even after the dialogue shifts to unrelated topics. We introduce PrivDrift, a benchmark for auditing whether user-disclosed secrets remain recoverable after conversational topic drift and persuasion-based probing. PrivDrift contains 1,000 controlled multi-turn dialogues with seeded secrets, content-dense drift turns, and standardized extraction probes. Across three LLMs with extended context windows, dialogue-level hybrid leakage remains substantial, ranging from 38.7% to 54.6%, and varies strongly by model, secret type, and persuasion intensity. Within the tested drift window, additional topic drift does not reliably reduce leakage, suggesting that privacy risk in active LLM contexts should be evaluated as a persistent behavioral failure mode rather than only as training-data memorization or immediate jailbreak behavior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 17 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  5. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  7. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
  9. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  10. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
  11. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
  12. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
4 more
  1. 2023MasterKey: Automated Jailbreak Across Multiple Large Language Model Chatbotscited by 183
  2. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
  3. 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 37
  4. 2025HarmNet: A Framework for Adaptive Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents
  2. 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents
  3. 2026Useless but Safe? Benchmarking Utility Recovery with User Intent Clarification in Multi-Turn Conversations
  4. 2024Undesirable Memorization in Large Language Models: A Survey
  5. 2025Sanitize Your Responses: Mitigating Privacy Leakage in Large Language Models
  6. 2026Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue
  7. 2026Can You Keep a Secret? Involuntary Information Leakage in Language Model Writing
  8. 2026CAMP: Cumulative Agentic Masking and Pruning for Privacy Protection in Multi-Turn LLM Conversations