Can You Keep a Secret? Involuntary Information Leakage in Language Model Writing
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models are deployed in settings that require compartmentalization: system prompts should not be disclosed, chain-of-thought reasoning is hidden from users, and sensitive data passes through shared contexts. We test whether models can keep prompted information out of their writing. We give each model a secret word with instructions not to reveal it, then ask it to write a story. A second model tries to identify the secret from the story in a binary discrimination test. The secret word never appears literally in any output, but all five frontier models we test leak it thematically -- through topic choice, imagery, and setting--6hy-at rates significantly different from chance, up to 79%. When told to actively hide the secret, models write away from it, and this avoidance is itself detectable. The leakage is cross-model readable, scales sharply with model size within two model families, and disappears entirely for short-form writing like jokes. Giving the model a decoy concept to ``focus on instead'' partially redirects the leakage from the real secret to the decoy. Attending to a secret appears to open up an information channel that frontier LLMs cannot close, even when instructed to.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
10 of 15 references.
References · 10
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
- 2025Base Models Beat Aligned Models at Randomness and Creativitycited by 51
- 2025Eliciting Secret Knowledge from Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025LLM Probability Concentration: How Alignment Shrinks the Generative Horizoncited by 26
- 2024Does Liking Yellow Imply Driving a School Bus? Semantic Leakage in Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Do LLMs Strategically Reveal, Conceal, and Infer Information? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis in The Chameleon Gamecited by 5
- 2026LLMs Can't Play Hangman: On the Necessity of a Private Working Memory for Language Agentscited by 4
- 2025Has My System Prompt Been Used? Large Language Model Prompt Membership Inferencecited by 3
- 2025Scaling Down Semantic Leakage: Investigating Associative Bias in Smaller Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Don't Think of the White Bear: Ironic Negation in Transformer Models Under Cognitive Loadcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards eliciting latent knowledge from LLMs with mechanistic interpretability
- 2026What the Model Cannot See: Covert and Provable Text Invisibility in LLMs
- 2026Do LLMs Really Forget? Hidden-State Leakage in Model Unlearning and How to Fix it
- 2024Undesirable Memorization in Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2026PrivDrift: Auditing User-Secret Leakage Under Topic Drift in Active LLM Conversations
- 2024Evil twins are not that evil: Qualitative insights into machine-generated prompts
- 2026Authorization Before Context: A Model-Neutral Audience Boundary Against Cross-Audience Memory Leakage in Agentic Systems
- 2026Discovering Universal Activation Directions for PII Leakage in Language Models