SGA: Uncertainty Quantification for Multi-Step Forecasting in Time Series Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent emergence of Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) has significantly advanced multi-step forecasting performance, enabling accurate predictions over extended future horizons. However, existing TSFMs often suffer from significantly inherent uncertainty, which typically manifests as derived forecast branches emerging at each time step and spreading to subsequent steps; different forecast branches often exhibit varying forecasting performance, thereby undermining the credibility of TSFM forecasts. In this paper, we propose the Slicing-Graphing-Alignment (SGA) method to quantify the uncertainty of multi-step TSFM forecasts. The proposed SGA first characterizes the topology of all potential forecast branches using a directed acyclic graph, such that the graph complexity bounds the uncertainty of multi-step forecasts, and then precisely measures the graph complexity by integrating both topological information and TSFM-inherent stochasticity. Experimental results conducted on 11 TSFMs and 27 datasets demonstrate that (i) SGA achieves the best performance when ranking predictive errors with uncertainty estimates; (ii) SGA works with a more extensive and more precise sampling coverage than those of existing UQ methods, deriving a quantification mechanism fundamentally different from those of established ones; and (iii) larger model scales of TSFMs correlate with lower uncertainty estimates of multi-step forecasts, suggesting another empirical scaling law for uncertainty quantification of multi-step TSFM forecasts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
- 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 350
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 293
- 2019Financial Time Series Forecasting with Deep Learning : A Systematic Literature Review: 2005-2019cited by 273
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
- 2025Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecastingcited by 194
9 more
- 2025Sundial: A Family of Highly Capable Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 180
- 2018Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifierscited by 113
- 2024Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraphcited by 105
- 2025Aurora: Towards Universal Generative Multimodal Time Series Forecastingcited by 29
- 2026Timer-S1: A Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Model with Serial Scalingcited by 28
- 2024Financial Fine-tuning a Large Time Series Modelcited by 8
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: Are Time Series Foundation Models Well-Calibrated?cited by 2
- 2026ProbFM: Probabilistic Time Series Foundation Model with Uncertainty Decompositioncited by 2
- 2026When to Trust, How to Distill: Multi-Foundation Model Guidance for Lightweight, Robust Scientific Time Series Forecastingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.