mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ProbFM: Probabilistic Time Series Foundation Model with Uncertainty Decomposition

arXiv 2601.10591 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI q-fin.RMcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) have emerged as a promising approach for zero-shot financial forecasting, demonstrating strong transferability and data efficiency gains. However, their adoption in financial applications is hindered by fundamental limitations in uncertainty quantification: current approaches either rely on restrictive distributional assumptions, conflate different sources of uncertainty, or lack principled calibration mechanisms. While recent TSFMs employ sophisticated techniques such as mixture models, Student's t-distributions, or conformal prediction, they fail to address the core challenge of providing theoretically-grounded uncertainty decomposition. For the very first time, we present a novel transformer-based probabilistic framework, ProbFM (probabilistic foundation model), that leverages Deep Evidential Regression (DER) to provide principled uncertainty quantification with explicit epistemic-aleatoric decomposition. Unlike existing approaches that pre-specify distributional forms or require sampling-based inference, ProbFM learns optimal uncertainty representations through higher-order evidence learning while maintaining single-pass computational efficiency. To rigorously evaluate the core DER uncertainty quantification approach independent of architectural complexity, we conduct an extensive controlled comparison study using a consistent LSTM architecture across five probabilistic methods: DER, Gaussian NLL, Student's-t NLL, Quantile Loss, and Conformal Prediction. Evaluation on cryptocurrency return forecasting demonstrates that DER maintains competitive forecasting accuracy while providing explicit epistemic-aleatoric uncertainty decomposition. This work establishes both an extensible framework for principled uncertainty quantification in foundation models and empirical evidence for DER's effectiveness in financial applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

8 of 13 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  5. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,013
  6. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  7. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  8. 2024Toto: Time Series Optimized Transformer for Observabilitycited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.