PAWS: Policy-driven Agentic World Simulation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy interventions propagate through public communication, institutional decisions, and stakeholder responses, yet datasets for financial multi-agent simulation rarely connect these processes to temporally aligned historical evidence. We introduce PAWS, a Policy-driven Agentic World Simulation dataset covering 36 verified U.S. financial and economic policy episodes, 12,727 policy-linked news records, and 65,291 source-grounded stakeholder actions. Each action is linked to its supporting news and represented by a multi-layer event frame capturing its interaction mode, financial-action family and subtype, semantic attributes, and conditional mappings to external taxonomies. Entities are resolved to normalized organizations, and actions are aligned with daily market-return context to support policy-agent simulation replay. On 2,522 stratified action samples, independent AI and human reviewers achieved 89.4% initial agreement on interaction mode, with disagreements subsequently adjudicated. Case studies of the 2008 short-selling ban and 2001 decimalization recover documented policy timelines and associated market patterns across both dense and sparse news settings. A replay study further shows that high accuracy can mask failure to detect rare stakeholder actions, identifying action timing and calibration as central challenges. PAWS provides an auditable substrate for evaluating agent influence, policy-response cascades, and action-outcome alignment in historically grounded financial simulations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
10 of 70 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025QuantAgents: Towards Multi-agent Financial System via Simulated Trading6 Oct
- 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework28 Dec
Other references · 8
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
- 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agentscited by 350
- 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
- 2021FinRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework to Automate Trading in Quantitative Financecited by 57
- 2019Doc2EDAG: An End-to-End Document-level Framework for Chinese Financial Event Extractioncited by 54
- 2019ABIDES: Towards High-Fidelity Market Simulation for AI Researchcited by 31
- 2016Two Tales of the World: Comparison of Widely Used World News Datasets GDELT and EventRegistrycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Modeling U.S. Attitudes Toward China via an Event-Steered Multi-Agent Simulator
- 2026ScioMind: Cognitively Grounded Multi-Agent Social Simulation with Anchoring-Based Belief Dynamics and Dynamic Profiles
- 2026Preserving Disagreement: Architectural Heterogeneity and Coherence Validation in Multi-Agent Policy Simulation
- 2026SocialFiVis: A Visual Analytics Sandbox for LLM-Grounded Multi-Agent Simulation in Social Finance
- 2025A Multi-LLM-Agent-Based Framework for Economic and Public Policy Analysis
- 2026Governance at the Boundary: How Agent Decomposition Degrades Policy Compliance
- 2026PolicySim: An LLM-Based Agent Social Simulation Sandbox for Proactive Policy Optimization
- 2025Modeling Hawkish-Dovish Latent Beliefs in Multi-Agent Debate-Based LLMs for Monetary Policy Decision Classification