Modeling Hawkish-Dovish Latent Beliefs in Multi-Agent Debate-Based LLMs for Monetary Policy Decision Classification
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately forecasting central bank policy decisions, particularly those of the Federal Open Market Committee(FOMC) has become increasingly important amid heightened economic uncertainty. While prior studies have used monetary policy texts to predict rate changes, most rely on static classification models that overlook the deliberative nature of policymaking. This study proposes a novel framework that structurally imitates the FOMC's collective decision-making process by modeling multiple large language models(LLMs) as interacting agents. Each agent begins with a distinct initial belief and produces a prediction based on both qualitative policy texts and quantitative macroeconomic indicators. Through iterative rounds, agents revise their predictions by observing the outputs of others, simulating deliberation and consensus formation. To enhance interpretability, we introduce a latent variable representing each agent's underlying belief(e.g., hawkish or dovish), and we theoretically demonstrate how this belief mediates the perception of input information and interaction dynamics. Empirical results show that this debate-based approach significantly outperforms standard LLMs-based baselines in prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the explicit modeling of beliefs provides insights into how individual perspectives and social influence shape collective policy forecasts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.
Builds on
9 of 36 references.
References · 9
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2024ResearchTown: Simulator of Human Research Communitycited by 35
- 2024Scope of Large Language Models for Mining Emerging Opinions in Online Health Discoursecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FedSight AI: Multi-Agent System Architecture for Federal Funds Target Rate Prediction
- 2025A Multi-LLM-Agent-Based Framework for Economic and Public Policy Analysis
- 2023EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activities
- 2026AI Economist Agent: An Agentic Framework for Evidence-Based Economic and Financial Analysis with RAG, Knowledge Graphs, and Large Language Models
- 2026FaVOR: LLM-Based Agentic Framework for Factor Mining via Empirical Validation
- 2026Multi-Agent Debate for Explainable Trading: Reasoning, Consensus, and Performance in Simulated Markets
- 2026FinCom: A Financial Multi-Agent Demo with Disagree-or-Commit Deliberation
- 2026Toward Reliable Evaluation of LLM-Based Financial Multi-Agent Systems: Taxonomy, Coordination Primacy, and Cost Awareness