mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combining Hierarchical Cognitive Process with Process Supervision for Interpretable Scene Safety Understanding

arXiv 2609.26399 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scene safety understanding plays a life-or-death role in situational awareness in various critical domains. Traditional methods that rely on learning direct mappings between scenes and safety levels often lack interpretability, limiting their reliability in critical applications. An effective approach to overcoming this challenge lies in interpreting human cognitive processes and equipping machine models with analogous cognitive capabilities. This work explores an effective way of integrating scene safety cognitive process modeling and process supervision. Specifically, we first construct a hierarchical cognitive safety structure, which motivates the development of a novel, high-quality scene safety understanding dataset based on multi-step reasoning with process labels. This dataset serves both as a benchmark and a resource to improve the safety reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), while also enabling a granular analysis of intermediate reasoning steps through information flow and saliency-based techniques. Building upon this foundation, we introduce a modular and flexible process supervision framework that reflects the hierarchical nature of human cognition. This framework leverages LLMs as the core architecture and incorporates Low-Rank Adaptation(LoRA) and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) strategies to enable specialization and collaboration among expert modules, each tasked with specific sub-processes of the overall reasoning chain. Systematic experimental evaluations and analyses confirm that our framework exhibits superior interpretability and performance characteristics compared to traditional approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  4. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  5. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  6. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
  7. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  8. 2023Larger language models do in-context learning differentlycited by 394
  9. 2022Why Exposure Bias Matters: An Imitation Learning Perspective of Error Accumulation in Language Generationcited by 108
  10. 2016A Hierarchical Approach for Generating Descriptive Image Paragraphscited by 104
  11. 2023Caption Anything: Interactive Image Description with Diverse Multimodal Controlscited by 99
  12. 2020Dark, Beyond Deep: A Paradigm Shift to Cognitive AI with Humanlike Common Sensecited by 62
6 more
  1. 2024LoRA-Flow: Dynamic LoRA Fusion for Large Language Models in Generative Taskscited by 39
  2. 2023RS2G: Data-Driven Scene-Graph Extraction and Embedding for Robust Autonomous Perception and Scenario Understandingcited by 17
  3. 2023PerceptionCLIP: Visual Classification by Inferring and Conditioning on Contextscited by 17
  4. 2023RiskBench: A Scenario-based Benchmark for Risk Identificationcited by 12
  5. 2024Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Scene Graphs for Traffic Accident Understandingcited by 10
  6. 2021Exploiting Natural Language for Efficient Risk-Aware Multi-robot SaR Planningcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SAVeS: Steering Safety Judgments in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Cues
  2. 2026Toward Autonomous Laboratory Safety Monitoring with Vision Language Models: Learning to See Hazards Through Scene Structure
  3. 2025Rethinking Bottlenecks in Safety Fine-Tuning of Vision Language Models
  4. 2025Self-Aware Safety Augmentation: Leveraging Internal Semantic Understanding to Enhance Safety in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Mind the Gap: Evaluating LLM Understanding of Human-Taught Road Safety Principles
  6. 2026SafeSceneReason: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark Connecting Industrial Hazards with Accident Knowledge
  7. 2026HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2025Graphormer-Guided Task Planning: Beyond Static Rules with LLM Safety Perception