Why Do Video Diffusion Models Violate Physics? Unveiling the Flaws in Attention Mechanisms
On the map: Diffusion models → Video generation
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite impressive visual quality, state-of-the-art video diffusion models often generate content that violates real-world physical laws. While existing solutions rely on external priors or specialized data, we investigate the root cause by exploring the internal mechanisms of these models. Specifically, we present the first interpretability study on the ''motion planning'' process of text-to-video diffusion models, revealing how motion trajectories form during early denoising stages. Building upon the ''first shape, then details'' finding, we combine cross-attention trajectory patterns with causal head contributions to identify a specific subset of attention heads driving motion planning. Further, our self-attention analysis shows that Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) induces excessive spatial attention decay. This causes early candidate regions to prematurely lock into physically implausible positions, suppressing reasonable trajectories in adjacent frames and triggering generation failure modes. To address this fundamental flaw, we propose a lightweight architectural modification that scales the frequency of RoPE across different denoising steps. This strategy reduces excessive attention decay, helping the model explore better candidate regions to establish coherent physical motion. Finally, training-free and training-based experiments confirm the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing the physical commonsense of generated videos.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Video generation, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 38 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.
Builds on
38 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Video Models Reason Early: Exploiting Plan Commitment for Maze Solving31 Mar
- 2026Demystifying Video Reasoning17 Mar
- 2025Learning Plug-and-play Memory for Guiding Video Diffusion Models24 Nov
- 2025Emergent Temporal Correspondences from Video Diffusion Transformers20 Jun
- 2025VideoREPA: Learning Physics for Video Generation through Relational Alignment with Foundation Models29 May
- 2025Understanding Attention Mechanism in Video Diffusion Models16 Apr
- 2025VLIPP: Towards Physically Plausible Video Generation with Vision and Language Informed Physical Prior30 Mar
- 2024PhyT2V: LLM-Guided Iterative Self-Refinement for Physics-Grounded Text-to-Video Generation30 Nov
- 2024MotionCraft: Physics-based Zero-Shot Video Generation22 May
- 2023GPT4Motion: Scripting Physical Motions in Text-to-Video Generation via Blender-Oriented GPT Planning21 Nov
Other references · 28
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,536
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 867
- 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 516
- 2022What the DAAM: Interpreting Stable Diffusion Using Cross Attentioncited by 233
- 2024VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generationcited by 215
- 2024How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspectivecited by 204
- 2024PhysGen: Rigid-Body Physics-Grounded Image-to-Video Generationcited by 169
16 more
- 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 167
- 2026Seedance 2.0: Advancing Video Generation for World Complexitycited by 142
- 2024Stable Flow: Vital Layers for Training-Free Image Editingcited by 111
- 2025WISA: World Simulator Assistant for Physics-Aware Text-to-Video Generationcited by 87
- 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 75
- 2023Localizing and Editing Knowledge in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 52
- 2024Towards Understanding the Working Mechanism of Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelcited by 48
- 2025NewtonGen: Physics-Consistent and Controllable Text-to-Video Generation via Neural Newtonian Dynamicscited by 40
- 2026Inference-time Physics Alignment of Video Generative Models with Latent World Modelscited by 32
- 2025Generative Physical AI in Vision: A Surveycited by 24
- 2025Emergence and Evolution of Interpretable Concepts in Diffusion Modelscited by 20
- 2025TIDE : Temporal-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Diffusion Transformers in Image Generationcited by 16
- 2025Synthetic Video Enhances Physical Fidelity in Video Synthesiscited by 15
- 2025ProPhy: Progressive Physical Alignment for Dynamic World Simulationcited by 11
- 2025Temporal Concept Dynamics in Diffusion Models via Prompt-Conditioned Interventionscited by 7
- 2026Circuit Mechanisms for Spatial Relation Generation in Diffusion Transformerscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Invisible Hand of Physics: When Video Diffusion Models Know More Than They Show
- 2026Seeking Physics in Diffusion Noise
- 2026Does Physics Live in the Activations? Localizing Physical Quantities in Video Diffusion Models
- 2026SIFT: Self-Imagination Fine-Tuning for Physically Plausible Motion in Video Diffusion Models
- 2026Physics in 2-Steps: Locking Motion Priors Before Visual Refinement Erases Them
- 2025Characterizing Motion Encoding in Video Diffusion Timesteps
- 2026Motion Concept Unlearning in Video Diffusion Models
- 2025Think Before You Diffuse: Infusing Physical Rules into Video Diffusion