mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IntLawNER: A Named Entity Recognition Dataset and Benchmark in International Law

arXiv 2609.22529 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

International law provides the normative framework through which states coordinate action, regulate armed conflict, and protect human rights, yet its texts remain without token-level named entity recognition (NER) resources. We introduce IntLawNER, a NER dataset and benchmark for codified sources of international law, covering 2,987 gold-annotated sentences and 8,094 entity spans from International Court of Justice (ICJ) decisions, UN Security Council resolutions, and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) judgments, annotated with seven institution-specific entity types. We construct IntLawNER with a cost-effective hybrid algorithmic-agentic pipeline that reduces 468k source sentences to a compact annotation set through candidate retrieval, LLM-based vetting, and human review, with 89.6% of gold spans accepted unchanged from the silver layer. However, the silver-to-gold analysis reveals that human-machine aggregate agreement metrics can be misleading in domain-specific NER: Cohen's kappa=0.964 on boundary-matched spans masks a macro-F1 of 0.753 when missing entities, boundary errors, and label corrections are included. The benchmark shows that zero-shot span-based GLiNER collapses on entity types dependent on institutional function rather than surface form (0.243 micro-F1), while fine-tuned transformers struggle on rare labels. Carefully selected few-shot examples that demonstrate label contrasts improve every LLM over zero-shot prompting, with Claude Opus 4.6 reaching the best score of 0.873 micro-F1. We release IntLawNER as a benchmark and reusable resource for extracting references in international legal texts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 31 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  2. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  3. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  4. 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 302
  5. 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 158
  6. 2023GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformercited by 84
  7. 2022Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgmentscited by 26
  8. 2020A Dataset of German Legal Documents for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 24
  9. 2023PromptNER: Prompt Locating and Typing for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 17
  10. 2025FiNERweb: Datasets and Artifacts for Scalable Multilingual Named Entity Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions
  2. 2026ILSIC: Corpora for Identifying Indian Legal Statutes from Queries by Laypeople
  3. 2025Scaling Legal AI: Benchmarking Mamba and Transformers for Statutory Classification and Case Law Retrieval
  4. 2023One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support
  5. 2026PROSLEX: A Novel Dataset for Expert-Annotated Legal Statute Prediction for Indian Judiciary
  6. 2026Navigating Global AI Regulation: A Multi-Jurisdictional Retrieval-Augmented Generation System
  7. 2024LAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights
  8. 2026UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning