SAFARI: An Industrial Benchmark for LLM-Assisted Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for safety-critical engineering, yet their reliability in regulated functional-safety workflows remains underexplored. We introduce SAFARI (Safety-Aware Functional Automotive Risk Inference), the first industrial benchmark for LLM-assisted automotive Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) under ISO 26262. It contains 3,000 de-identified industrial HARA cases and evaluates two coupled tasks: open-ended hazard analysis and standards-grounded risk assessment. To evaluate open-ended HARA artifacts, we propose the first reference-anchored LLM-as-a-judge protocol with high expert correlation. Experiments with nine frontier LLMs show that models often produce plausible hazard narratives but remain weak at ISO 26262 risk classification, with the best ASIL macro-F1 reaching only 0.261. Chain-of-Thought prompting provides limited benefit and often degrades categorical risk assessment. Error analysis further localizes major failures to scenario-critical context omissions during hazard generation and to controllability misjudgments during risk assessment, indicating where expert oversight should be concentrated. The dataset can be obtained from https://github.com/xixi47520-hash/HARA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
References · 17
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2018Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehiclescited by 48
- 2017Ontology based Scene Creation for the Development of Automated Vehiclescited by 40
- 2025Do LLM Evaluators Prefer Themselves for a Reason?cited by 38
- 2023When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Taskscited by 37
- 2023Safety Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Case Study of STPA using ChatGPTcited by 13
- 2025Lost in Pronunciation: Detecting Chinese Offensive Language Disguised by Phonetic Cloaking Replacementcited by 10
- 2025Can GRPO Boost Complex Multimodal Table Understanding?cited by 10
- 2023Milestones in Autonomous Driving and Intelligent Vehicles Part II: Perception and Planningcited by 9
- 2024Aegis:An Advanced LLM-Based Multi-Agent for Intelligent Functional Safety Engineeringcited by 7
- 2025MedFact: A Large-scale Chinese Dataset for Evidence-based Medical Fact-checking of LLM Responsescited by 6
- 2026PsychEthicsBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Against Australian Mental Health Ethicscited by 4
5 more
- 2026Do No Harm: Exposing Hidden Vulnerabilities of LLMs via Persona-based Client Simulation Attack in Psychological Counselingcited by 4
- 2024Template-Driven LLM-Paraphrased Framework for Tabular Math Word Problem Generationcited by 3
- 2020Towards Efficient Hazard Identification in the Concept Phase of Driverless Vehicle Developmentcited by 2
- 2018Identification of Potential Hazardous Events for an Unmanned Protective Vehiclecited by 1
- 2026AudioProcessBench: Benchmark for Identifying Process Errors in Audio-Grounded Reasoningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DriveSafe: A Hierarchical Risk Taxonomy for Safety-Critical LLM-Based Driving Assistants
- 2024Engineering Safety Requirements for Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models
- 2025Measuring What Matters: A Framework for Evaluating Safety Risks in Real-World LLM Applications
- 2025Large Language Models in Code Co-generation for Safe Autonomous Vehicles
- 2025RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration
- 2024LabSafety Bench: Benchmarking LLMs on Safety Issues in Scientific Labs
- 2025Aegis2.0: A Diverse AI Safety Dataset and Risks Taxonomy for Alignment of LLM Guardrails
- 2025SoSBench: Benchmarking Safety Alignment on Six Scientific Domains