mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring What Matters: A Framework for Evaluating Safety Risks in Real-World LLM Applications

arXiv 2507.09820 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2025cs.SE cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most safety testing efforts for large language models (LLMs) today focus on evaluating foundation models. However, there is a growing need to evaluate safety at the application level, as components such as system prompts, retrieval pipelines, and guardrails introduce additional factors that significantly influence the overall safety of LLM applications. In this paper, we introduce a practical framework for evaluating application-level safety in LLM systems, validated through real-world deployment across multiple use cases within our organization. The framework consists of two parts: (1) principles for developing customized safety risk taxonomies, and (2) practices for evaluating safety risks in LLM applications. We illustrate how the proposed framework was applied in our internal pilot, providing a reference point for organizations seeking to scale their safety testing efforts. This work aims to bridge the gap between theoretical concepts in AI safety and the operational realities of safeguarding LLM applications in practice, offering actionable guidance for safe and scalable deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment
  2. 2024Current state of LLM Risks and AI Guardrails
  3. 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey
  4. 2026ForesightSafety-SAGE:A Fully Automated Scenario Generation and Safety Evaluation Framework for LLM Agents
  5. 2025Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety
  6. 2025Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models
  7. 2025Analysing Safety Risks in LLMs Fine-Tuned with Pseudo-Malicious Cyber Security Data
  8. 2025LLM-Safety Evaluations Lack Robustness