Multimodal Foundation Models Adaptation based on Domain-Aware Relaxed Orthogonal Subspace for Remote Sensing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pretrained foundation models (FMs) have achieved remarkable success in computer vision, yet their high fine-tuning cost limits practical deployment. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) improve efficiency by constraining updates to a predefined low-rank subspace. However, when applied to remote sensing tasks with substantial domain shifts, the fixed subspace is constructed without observing the downstream activation distribution and can therefore provide a poor coordinate system for adaptation, a phenomenon herein termed subspace mismatch. To address this issue, a unified framework is introduced, termed Domain-aware Relaxed Orthogonal Subspace adaptation (DROS), which reformulates low-rank adaptation as data-conditioned subspace learning and flexible subspace adaptation. Specifically, the weight decomposition is conditioned on second-order activation statistics estimated from the downstream training distribution, so that the initialization reflects the feature geometry actually induced by the remote-sensing data, followed by flexible geometric transformations enabled by a relaxed orthogonal parameterization. Furthermore, the framework is extended to multimodal settings (MM-DROS) by sharing transformation structures across modality-specific subspaces, facilitating efficient cross-modal interaction. Extensive experiments on multiple remote sensing benchmarks demonstrate that DROS achieves state-of-the-art performance, even surpassing full fine-tuning, without additional inference overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.
Builds on
41 of 66 references.
References · 41
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 758
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
29 more
- 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
- 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 565
- 2020Open-Vocabulary Object Detection Using Captionscited by 427
- 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 381
- 2023AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 357
- 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 308
- 2024PiSSA: Principal Singular Values and Singular Vectors Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 269
- 2021LoveDA: A Remote Sensing Land-Cover Dataset for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 261
- 2021Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Datacited by 215
- 2020Geography-Aware Self-Supervised Learningcited by 190
- 2023RSPrompter: Learning to Prompt for Remote Sensing Instance Segmentation based on Visual Foundation Modelcited by 181
- 2023CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoderscited by 169
- 2023ASVD: Activation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Compressing Large Language Modelscited by 169
- 2022Advancing Plain Vision Transformer Towards Remote Sensing Foundation Modelcited by 149
- 2023GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoringcited by 124
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
- 2023Stronger, Fewer, & Superior: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentationcited by 83
- 2024LoRA-XS: Low-Rank Adaptation with Extremely Small Number of Parameterscited by 76
- 2024AnySat: One Earth Observation Model for Many Resolutions, Scales, and Modalitiescited by 74
- 2021TorchGeo: Deep Learning With Geospatial Datacited by 73
- 2023A Billion-scale Foundation Model for Remote Sensing Imagescited by 62
- 2024CorDA: Context-Oriented Decomposition Adaptation of Large Language Models for Task-Aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 44
- 2025BRIGHT: A globally distributed multimodal building damage assessment dataset with very-high-resolution for all-weather disaster responsecited by 41
- 2025Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Geospatial Foundation Models through Embedding Deflectioncited by 10
- 2024Evaluating and Benchmarking Foundation Models for Earth Observation and Geospatial AIcited by 8
- 2025Orthogonal Finetuning Made Scalablecited by 7
- 2025PeftCD: Leveraging Vision Foundation Models with Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Remote Sensing Change Detectioncited by 5
- 2024Matrix-Transformation Based Low-Rank Adaptation (MTLoRA): A Brain-Inspired Method for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 2
- 2025Earth-Adapter: Bridge the Geospatial Domain Gaps with Mixture of Frequency Adaptationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.