mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

From Fixed Keys to Readable Schemas: Small Language Models for Vehicle Agent Function Calls

arXiv 2609.09476 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling

Abstract (arXiv)

In-vehicle assistants must translate natural-language requests into accurate vehicle function calls under strict memory and latency constraints, making small language models (SLMs) attractive for on-device deployment. For such models, a key design choice is how the available function surface is presented. Two approaches are to represent each function with a dedicated Functional Token (FT) or provide function schemas directly in the prompt. FTs enable compact inference but are restricted to functions learned during training, whereas Schema-in-Prompt (SIP) can generalize to unseen functions at the cost of longer prompts and higher inference overhead. We introduce a benchmark of 9,822 single-turn examples spanning 79 vehicle functions derived from Android Automotive, including held-out functions and requests requiring refusal. We compare both approaches under matched fine-tuning across four SLMs from 270M to 1.7B parameters. On functions seen during training, scaling provides limited benefit: the 270M model can match the 1.7B model, and the highest Seen accuracy in our main grid occurs at 0.6B. On held-out functions, FT achieves zero accuracy by construction, whereas SIP generalizes and improves substantially with scale. On out-of-scope requests, FT can invoke an unavailable function it was trained to emit, while SIP more reliably refuses based on the functions offered. This flexibility comes with a higher inference cost, chiefly the latency of processing the schema prompt. Our theoretical analysis formalizes why only SIP can predict functions withheld as training targets and why longer schema contexts increase inference cost. Overall, function-surface representation, rather than model scale alone, determines the capabilities and failure modes of SLM-based vehicle function calling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Optimizing Small Language Models for In-Vehicle Function-Calling4 Jan
  2. 2024Hammer: Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Models via Function Masking6 Oct
  3. 2024TinyAgent: Function Calling at the Edge1 Sep
  4. 2024Octopus v2: On-device language model for super agent2 Apr
  5. 2023ToolkenGPT: Augmenting Frozen Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Embeddings19 May

Other references · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,231
  4. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,424
  5. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,191
  6. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,126
  7. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 925
  8. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 825
  9. 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 785
  10. 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 720
  11. 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 676
  12. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 643
8 more
  1. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 534
  2. 2023Prompt Cache: Modular Attention Reuse for Low-Latency Inferencecited by 258
  3. 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 197
  4. 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 188
  5. 2019Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving Carcited by 142
  6. 2024xLAM: A Family of Large Action Models to Empower AI Agent Systemscited by 109
  7. 2023Personalized Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models: Field Experimentscited by 47
  8. 2024An Information-Theoretic Analysis of In-Context Learningcited by 39

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Small Models, Big Tasks: An Exploratory Empirical Study on Small Language Models for Function Calling
  2. 2026Extending FunctionGemma for Practical On-Device Mobile Function Calling
  3. 2026Small Reasoning Models are Instruction Followers in Function Calling
  4. 2026From Natural Language Policies to Executable Obligations: A Verification Harness for Dependable In-Car LLM Agents
  5. 2025On the Robustness of Agentic Function Calling
  6. 2026CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World Uncertainty
  7. 2024HammerBench: Fine-Grained Function-Calling Evaluation in Real Mobile Device Scenarios
  8. 2026Data Turnstile: A Scalable Open Framework for Function-Calling Data Generation