mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Oblique Rule Boosting for Simpler Additive Rule Ensembles

arXiv 2609.06426 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Small additive ensembles of symbolic rules offer interpretable prediction models. Traditionally, these ensembles use rule conditions based on conjunctions of simple threshold propositions x ≥ t on a single input variable x and threshold t, resulting geometrically in axis-parallel polytopes as decision regions. While this form ensures a high degree of interpretability for individual rules and can be learned efficiently using the gradient boosting approach, it relies on having access to a curated set of expressive input features so that a small ensemble of axis-parallel regions can describe the target variable well. Absent such features, reaching sufficient accuracy requires increasing the number and complexity of individual rules, which diminishes the interpretability of the model. Here, we extend classical rule ensembles by introducing logical propositions with learnable sparse linear transformations of input variables, i.e., propositions of the form xTw ≥ t, where w is a learnable sparse weight vector, enabling decision regions as general polyhedrons with oblique faces. We propose a learning method using gradient boosting based on a weighted logistic regression. Empirical results across 14 regression and classification tasks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves lower model complexity than competitive baselines while maintaining similar or better predictive accuracy. Hence, the approach provides a favorable trade-off between interpretability and accuracy and reduces the reliance on manual feature engineering.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 37 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
  3. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
  4. 2016Learning Optimized Risk Scorescited by 47
  5. 2021Learning Accurate and Interpretable Decision Rule Sets from Neural Networkscited by 25
  6. 2020Interpretable Random Forests via Rule Extractioncited by 23
  7. 2023Learning Interpretable Rules for Scalable Data Representation and Classificationcited by 14
  8. 2021Better Short than Greedy: Interpretable Models through Optimal Rule Boostingcited by 6
  9. 2020Neural Rule Ensembles: Encoding Sparse Feature Interactions into Neural Networkscited by 3
  10. 2024Orthogonal Gradient Boosting for Simpler Additive Rule Ensemblescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.