mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Interpretable Rules for Scalable Data Representation and Classification

arXiv 2310.14336 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rule-based models, e.g., decision trees, are widely used in scenarios demanding high model interpretability for their transparent inner structures and good model expressivity. However, rule-based models are hard to optimize, especially on large data sets, due to their discrete parameters and structures. Ensemble methods and fuzzy/soft rules are commonly used to improve performance, but they sacrifice the model interpretability. To obtain both good scalability and interpretability, we propose a new classifier, named Rule-based Representation Learner (RRL), that automatically learns interpretable non-fuzzy rules for data representation and classification. To train the non-differentiable RRL effectively, we project it to a continuous space and propose a novel training method, called Gradient Grafting, that can directly optimize the discrete model using gradient descent. A novel design of logical activation functions is also devised to increase the scalability of RRL and enable it to discretize the continuous features end-to-end. Exhaustive experiments on ten small and four large data sets show that RRL outperforms the competitive interpretable approaches and can be easily adjusted to obtain a trade-off between classification accuracy and model complexity for different scenarios. Our code is available at: https://github.com/12wang3/rrl.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2023.

Builds on

30 of 68 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  7. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  8. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  9. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  10. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  11. 2015BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagationscited by 592
  12. 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 548
18 more
  1. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
  2. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
  3. 2020Binary Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 190
  4. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  5. 2020Generalized and Scalable Optimal Sparse Decision Treescited by 100
  6. 2018Deep Neural Decision Treescited by 72
  7. 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
  8. 2018ProxQuant: Quantized Neural Networks via Proximal Operatorscited by 59
  9. 2019Generalized Linear Rule Modelscited by 36
  10. 2018Exact and Consistent Interpretation for Piecewise Linear Neural Networks: A Closed Form Solutioncited by 32
  11. 2016Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable: A Bayesian Model Selection Approachcited by 27
  12. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Hierarchical Rule Inductioncited by 23
  13. 2021Differentiable Logic Machinescited by 18
  14. 2019Learning Algorithms via Neural Logic Networkscited by 17
  15. 2019Transparent Classification with Multilayer Logical Perceptrons and Random Binarizationcited by 17
  16. 2023FIRE: An Optimization Approach for Fast Interpretable Rule Extractioncited by 5
  17. 2018Mining Interpretable AOG Representations from Convolutional Networks via Active Question Answeringcited by 4
  18. 2023Learning Symbolic Rules over Abstract Meaning Representations for Textual Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 5.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: