Separating Capability from Confidence: Grounded Dual-State Calibration for GRPO-Trained Medical Vision-Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) require confidence that reflects both answer correctness and patient-specific visual evidence. Recent GRPO-based methods optimize verbalized confidence together with answer generation. However, this joint optimization may interfere with answer learning and drive confidence toward near-binary values. Verbalized confidence also provides no explicit assessment of visual support. We therefore separate capability learning from confidence estimation and propose DualRead. DualRead builds on the insight that reliability can be read from the actor's internal states at critical moments in the answering process. It freezes the GRPO-trained actor and combines pre-answer solvability with a post-answer assessment of the generated answer and its visual support. To further assess whether confidence reflects visual grounding, we introduce Counterfactual Confidence Grounding AUC (CCG-AUC). It measures whether confidence decreases when real-image substitution changes the actor from correct to incorrect. Across two VLM backbones and both in- and out-of-distribution medical VQA benchmarks, DualRead improves correctness discrimination and calibration over verbalized confidence while preserving answer accuracy. CCG-AUC reveals whether confidence responds to answer-relevant visual evidence rather than primarily to non-visual cues.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 475
- 2026MedGemma 1.5 Technical Reportcited by 45
- 2026Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewardscited by 14
- 2025Object-Level Verbalized Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Perturbationcited by 12
- 2026VL-Calibration: Decoupled Confidence Calibration for Large Vision-Language Models Reasoningcited by 8
- 2026Do Medical Vision Language Models Actually See? A Counterfactual Grounding Framework and Hard-Negative Contrastive Training for Visually-Reliant Medical VLMscited by 7
- 2026Overconfidence and Calibration in Medical VQA: Empirical Findings and Hallucination-Aware Mitigationcited by 6
- 2026Grounded or Guessing? LVLM Confidence Estimation via Blind-Image Contrastive Rankingcited by 5
- 2026Just how sure are you? Improving Verbalized Uncertainty Calibration in Medical VQAcited by 3
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Calibrated Triage, Not Autonomy: Confidence Estimation for Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2026To Agree or To Be Right? The Grounding-Sycophancy Tradeoff in Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2026The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models
- 2024SURE-VQA: Systematic Understanding of Robustness Evaluation in Medical VQA Tasks
- 2026Confident but Unreliable: A Behavioral Safety Audit of Vision-Language Models on Brain MRI
- 2026Small Vision-Language Models Know When They Are Wrong But Cannot Say So: A Two-Model Study of Stated versus Internal Confidence Under Realistic Image Degradation
- 2026Uncertainty Is Not a Safety Net for Clinical VQA, but Can It Anticipate Model Failure?
- 2026Benchmarking Direct Preference Optimization for Medical Large Vision-Language Models