mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Object-Level Verbalized Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Perturbation

arXiv 2504.14848 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel in various multimodal tasks but frequently suffer from poor calibration, resulting in misalignment between their verbalized confidence and response correctness. This miscalibration undermines user trust, especially when models confidently provide incorrect or fabricated information. In this work, we propose a novel Confidence Calibration through Semantic Perturbation (CSP) framework to improve the calibration of verbalized confidence for VLMs in response to object-centric queries. We first introduce a perturbed dataset where Gaussian noise is applied to the key object regions to simulate visual uncertainty at different confidence levels, establishing an explicit mapping between visual ambiguity and confidence levels. We further enhance calibration through a two-stage training process combining supervised fine-tuning on the perturbed dataset with subsequent preference optimization. Extensive experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the alignment between verbalized confidence and response correctness while maintaining or enhancing overall task performance. These results highlight the potential of semantic perturbation as a practical tool for improving the reliability and interpretability of VLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation13 Nov

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  4. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  6. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  7. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  8. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  9. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  10. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  11. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  12. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
5 more
  1. 2024SWIFT:A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuningcited by 355
  2. 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 256
  3. 2023Conformal Prediction with Large Language Models for Multi-Choice Question Answeringcited by 139
  4. 2024SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective Rationalescited by 105
  5. 2024Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026VL-Calibration: Decoupled Confidence Calibration for Large Vision-Language Models Reasoning
  3. 2026VLM-UQBench: A Benchmark for Modality-Specific and Cross-Modality Uncertainties in Vision Language Models
  4. 2026Calibrate Before Reason: Robust Visual Token Reduction against Semantic Drift in VLMs
  5. 2025Test-Time Consistency in Vision Language Models
  6. 2026Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models Under Noisy Conditions