mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Capsule Lens: Locating and Tracking Concept Geometry in Model Representations

arXiv 2609.05575 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how concepts are encoded in the internal representations of machine learning models is a central problem in mechanistic interpretability, essential both for the science of deep learning and for the trustworthy deployment of increasingly capable models. Existing approaches to interpret model representations mainly map representations onto more interpretable spaces and do not directly characterize how concepts occupy representation space; various hypotheses have been proposed, but often lack of rigorous validation and largely focus on static representations. In this work, we introduce Capsule Lens, a framework that matches the region a concept occupies with a simple, trackable geometric form, a capsule, defined by several interpretable parameters, fitted in closed form to each concept's geometry and validated on held-out samples. We apply Capsule Lens in two major settings: static and dynamic representations. On static representations, we demonstrate how to locate concept geometry across various models, and how the span and norm curves uncover important geometric characteristics. On dynamic representations, we present three case studies tracking representation drifts induced by distinct training settings, CLIP pretraining, RL post-training on visual question answering, and RL post-training on mathematical reasoning. These analyses reveal qualitatively different geometric dynamics, ranging from broad network-wide restructuring in CLIP pretraining to localized and concept-specific changes in RL post-training. Our results include findings aligned with existing literature as well as novel observations. We believe Capsule Lens stands as a promising tool for locating, analyzing, and tracking concept geometry in both static and dynamic representations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 55 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

55 of 70 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr
  2. 2025A Unified Theory of Sparse Dictionary Learning in Mechanistic Interpretability: Piecewise Biconvexity and Spurious Minima5 Dec
  3. 2025The Origins of Representation Manifolds in Large Language Models23 May
  4. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoders21 Mar
  5. 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structure10 Oct

Other references · 50

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  7. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  9. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  10. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  11. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  12. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
38 more
  1. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  2. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  3. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  4. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  5. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
  6. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
  7. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
  8. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
  9. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  10. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
  11. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  12. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  13. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
  14. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
  15. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMscited by 289
  16. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
  17. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  18. 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 209
  19. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  20. 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 172
  21. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoningcited by 162
  22. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 159
  23. 2025The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational Independencecited by 115
  24. 2021Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networkscited by 52
  25. 2024Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semanticscited by 44
  26. 2025RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimizationcited by 35
  27. 2026Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behaviorcited by 26
  28. 2025Towards Understanding Fine-Tuning Mechanisms of LLMs via Circuit Analysiscited by 20
  29. 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Studycited by 16
  30. 2026Rethinking Generalization in Reasoning SFT: A Conditional Analysis on Optimization, Data, and Model Capabilitycited by 14
  31. 2025On the Emergence of Linear Analogies in Word Embeddingscited by 13
  32. 2026Cross-Architecture Model Diffing with Crosscoders: Unsupervised Discovery of Differences Between LLMscited by 12
  33. 2025Rep2Text: Decoding Full Text from a Single LLM Token Representationcited by 7
  34. 2025Human-like Content Analysis for Generative AI with Language-Grounded Sparse Encoderscited by 6
  35. 2025Model Internal Sleuthing: Finding Lexical Identity and Inflectional Features in Modern Language Modelscited by 5
  36. 2026The Lattice Representation Hypothesis of Large Language Modelscited by 3
  37. 2025Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
  38. 2026Tracking Representation Dynamics in Large Language Models with Persistent Homologycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Laguerre Geometry for Interpreting Large Language Models
  2. 2025Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why
  3. 2025Hypothesis-Driven Feature Manifold Analysis in LLMs via Supervised Multi-Dimensional Scaling
  4. 2026Through the LENS: Local Geometric Decomposition of Vision-Language Model Representations
  5. 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones
  6. 2026Rotate2Think: Geometric Priming via Orthogonal Rotation to Improve Language Model Reasoning
  7. 2026Transformer Geometry Observatory TGO-III: Semantic Geometry Observatory
  8. 2026The Geometry of Representational Failures in Vision Language Models