Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep sequence models are said to store atomic facts predominantly in the form of associative memory: a brute-force lookup of co-occurring entities. We identify a dramatically different form of storage of atomic facts that we term as geometric memory. Here, the model has synthesized embeddings encoding novel global relationships between all entities, including ones that do not co-occur in training. Such storage is powerful: for instance, we show how it transforms a hard reasoning task involving an ℓ-fold composition into an easy-to-learn 1-step navigation task. From this phenomenon, we extract fundamental aspects of neural embedding geometries that are hard to explain. We argue that the rise of such a geometry, as against a lookup of local associations, cannot be straightforwardly attributed to typical supervisory, architectural, or optimizational pressures. Counterintuitively, a geometry is learned even when it is more complex than the brute-force lookup. Then, by analyzing a connection to Node2Vec, we demonstrate how the geometry stems from a spectral bias that -- in contrast to prevailing theories -- indeed arises naturally despite the lack of various pressures. This analysis also points out to practitioners a visible headroom to make Transformer memory more strongly geometric. We hope the geometric view of parametric memory encourages revisiting the default intuitions that guide researchers in areas like knowledge acquisition, capacity, discovery, and unlearning.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometrycited by 4
- 2026Discrete Diffusion Models Exploit Asymmetry to Solve Lookahead Planning Taskscited by 4
- 2026Explaining Grokking in Transformers through the Lens of Inductive Biascited by 2
- 2026Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token predictioncited by 2
- 2026Analysis of Optimality of Large Language Models on Planning Problemscited by 1
- 2026Geometric Factual Recall in Transformerscited by 1
- 2026On the Relationship Between Representation Geometry and Generalization in Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026DecompressionLM: Deterministic, Diagnostic, and Zero-Shot Concept Graph Extraction from Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Do Language Models Need Sleep? Offline Recurrence for Improved Online Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction25 Jun 2026
- 2026Do Language Models Need Sleep? Offline Recurrence for Improved Online Inference25 May 2026
- 2026Geometric Factual Recall in Transformers12 May 2026
- 2026Analysis of Optimality of Large Language Models on Planning Problems3 Apr 2026
- 2026Discrete Diffusion Models Exploit Asymmetry to Solve Lookahead Planning Tasks23 Feb 2026
- 2026Explaining Grokking in Transformers through the Lens of Inductive Bias6 Feb 2026
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometry2 Feb 2026
- 2026DecompressionLM: Deterministic, Diagnostic, and Zero-Shot Concept Graph Extraction from Language Models30 Jan 2026
- 2026On the Relationship Between Representation Geometry and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks28 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Geometric Framework for Understanding Memorization in Generative Models
- 2026Abstract representational geometry supports inference in large language models
- 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space
- 2026Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2026The Lattice Representation Hypothesis of Large Language Models
- 2025Unraveling the geometry of visual relational reasoning
- 2023Infusing Lattice Symmetry Priors in Attention Mechanisms for Sample-Efficient Abstract Geometric Reasoning
- 2026What Converges in the Platonic Representation Hypothesis? Structure over Geometry