Rotate2Think: Geometric Priming via Orthogonal Rotation to Improve Language Model Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning models achieve strong performance on challenging tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning traces before producing a final answer. Yet the internal structure of representation space when reasoning remains poorly understood: how do a model's hidden representations differ during thinking versus the embeddings of the input prompt, and can this structure be exploited to elicit stronger reasoning at inference time? We show that both input embeddings and thinking embeddings (mean-pooled last-layer hidden states over the prompt and reasoning trace, respectively) exhibit extremely high conicity, with all vectors clustering tightly around a single mean direction. Crucially, these mean input and thinking directions are non-collinear, with thinking embeddings occupying a geometrically distinct region of embedding space across many different models and benchmark tasks. This observation motivates casting the input-to-thinking transition as a rotation problem admitting a closed-form solution via orthogonal Procrustes analysis. We propose Rotate2Think, a training-free method that estimates this rotation from a small set of correctly solved examples and injects the resulting synthetic thinking vector between thinking delimiters at inference time, providing a geometric primer at the onset of the reasoning trace. Evaluated across multiple benchmarks and model families, Rotate2Think improves accuracy in 30 of 32 model-benchmark configurations across mathematics, science, and code tasks, and generalizes zero-shot to multimodal reasoning on MATH-Vision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
Other references · 11
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 362
- 2026Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representationscited by 20
- 2025The Markovian Thinker: Architecture-Agnostic Linear Scaling of Reasoningcited by 12
- 2026Therefore I am. I Thinkcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Convergence Without Understanding: When Language Models Agree on Representations but Disagree on Reasoning
- 2026The Illusion of Superposition? A Principled Analysis of Latent Thinking in Language Models
- 2025Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When
- 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space
- 2026A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM
- 2026J-CoT: Chain-of-Thought in J-Space
- 2026Reasoning emerges from constrained inference manifolds in large language models
- 2026Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models