Corporate Language Model (CLM): Transforming Tacit and Fragmented Enterprise Knowledge into a Sovereign, Auditable, and Executable Corporate Intelligence Layer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise AI deployments fail not from model inadequacy, but because organizations lack a structured substrate encoding how they decide, negotiate, and execute. Generic LLMs carry no firm-specific ontological priors; RAG remains brittle, with no path to executable action; static playbooks encode logic but cannot reason or adapt. This demands an architecture treating tacit-knowledge capture, ontological grounding, sovereign deployment, and auditable actuation as co-designed from the start. This paper introduces the Corporate Language Model (CLM), a framework transforming a firm's structured, unstructured, multimodal, and tacit knowledge into an ontology-grounded enterprise foundation upon which reasoning and governed execution are composed. CLM has five capability planes and four architectural pillars: a Neurosymbolic Mesh coupling generative models with a knowledge graph; a Skill Graph where reusable tactics, personas, objections, and goals are typed and composed; Living Digital Twins modeling functional areas as reasoning surrogates; and a Deep Security Layer enforcing sovereignty, traceability, and human oversight. A Spec-as-Code paradigm bridges grounded intent and executable artifact. CLM is one instantiation of this foundation-centric class. Four contributions follow: CLM is defined as a distinct object of study; the Skill Graph is introduced for compositional explainability by construction; the Wisdom Listener effect is proposed, whereby tacit-capable foundations compound in value with use, connecting to dynamic capabilities and organizational learning; and evidence from a JCI-accredited tertiary hospital in Brazil instantiates three of the six maturity stages under LGPD.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
7 of 10 references.
References · 7
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 255
- 2024Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 197
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Ontology-Constrained Neural Reasoning in Enterprise Agentic Systems: A Neurosymbolic Architecture for Domain-Grounded AI Agents
- 2023Fine-tuning Large Enterprise Language Models via Ontological Reasoning
- 2026Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification
- 2026EnterpriseVal: Quantifying the Efficacy, Reliability and Value of Generative AI in the Enterprise
- 2026OrgForge: A Multi-Agent Simulation Framework for Verifiable Synthetic Corporate Corpora
- 2026SKILLS: Structured Knowledge Injection for LLM-Driven Telecommunications Operations
- 2026Unifying Ontology Construction and Semantic Alignment for Deterministic Enterprise Reasoning at Scale
- 2026BADGER: Bridging Agentic and Deterministic Evaluation for Generative Enterprise Reasoning