The Civilization Framework: Sovereign-Anchored Communication Between Personal Multi-Agent Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans are the transport layer between AI systems, losing context at every hop. We present the Civilization Framework, whose addressable party is the civilization, not the agent (one human sovereign, a persistent ledger, and interchangeable agents), and the Embassy Protocol, a carrier-agnostic overlay: messages arrive asynchronously at a resident ledger endpoint, any online agent of the receiver handles them, and commitment state on both ledgers, not delivery, is ground truth. Authority derives from memory: an agent's power to act for its civilization is capped by the memory it can access and externalized through signed credentials, separate from civilization-level reputation. We identify the temporal-weight effect, a hazard in AI-to-AI communication where what arrives first acquires unearned authority, and test it in one frontier model in a preregistered 1,908-trial experiment. With verification removed, an incorrect upstream claim arriving first captures 54.2% of answers (4.2% under full verification), while the same claim arriving after the receiver has sealed its own answer captures 31.6% (the two prompt shells are not length-matched, so part of that gap may reflect shell form; see Section 7), and both registered question-set specifications agree on these two verdicts (the exclusion specification is preregistered as under-powered). Two secondary results, the mitigation from instruction-level provenance labeling and sealed-answer accuracy equivalence, are specification-dependent, holding only under the all-questions specification. Because a registered check of tool use failed its call-budget condition, the registration classifies the round as inconclusive and every result above, primary and secondary, is reported as exploratory; a replication with harness-enforced budgets is planned. The framework's intra-civilization layer has a working implementation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 158 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
54 of 158 references.
References · 54
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?cited by 74
- 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agentscited by 63
- 2025Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024A Scalable Communication Protocol for Networks of Large Language Modelscited by 43
- 2025Infrastructure for AI Agentscited by 40
- 2024Anchoring Bias in Large Language Models: An Experimental Studycited by 37
- 2015A Survey on Truth Discoverycited by 36
38 more
- 2024Serial Position Effects of Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2025When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent Reasoningcited by 20
- 2025AI Agents with Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentialscited by 17
- 2026Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflictcited by 15
- 2025BlockA2A: Towards Secure and Verifiable Agent-to-Agent Interoperabilitycited by 14
- 2026The Confidence Dichotomy: Analyzing and Mitigating Miscalibration in Tool-Use Agentscited by 14
- 2025Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspectivecited by 12
- 2025Debate-to-Detect: Reformulating Misinformation Detection as a Real-World Debate with Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2026Over-Searching in Search-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Inter-Agent Trust Models: A Comparative Study of Brief, Claim, Proof, Stake, Reputation and Constraint in Agentic Web Protocol Design-A2A, AP2, ERC-8004, and Beyondcited by 8
- 2025Distributional AGI Safetycited by 8
- 2026Accommodation and Epistemic Vigilance: A Pragmatic Account of Why LLMs Fail to Challenge Harmful Beliefscited by 8
- 2025From Multi-Agent Systems and the Semantic Web to Agentic AI: A Unified Narrative of the Web of Agentscited by 7
- 2026Right to History: A Sovereignty Kernel for Verifiable AI Agent Executioncited by 7
- 2026Governing Dynamic Capabilities: Cryptographic Binding and Reproducibility Verification for AI Agent Tool Usecited by 7
- 2024Human-Agent Cooperation in Games under Incomplete Information through Natural Language Communicationcited by 6
- 2025Understanding the Anchoring Effect of LLM with Synthetic Data: Existence, Mechanism, and Potential Mitigationscited by 6
- 2025A Layered Protocol Architecture for the Internet of Agentscited by 5
- 2026When the Tool Decides: LLM Agents Defer Blindly to Graph Neural Network Tools, and Stronger Backbones Defer Morecited by 5
- 2025Interaction, Process, Infrastructure: A Unified Framework for Human-Agent Collaborationcited by 4
- 2025Grassroots Federation: Fair Democratic Governance at Scalecited by 3
- 2026LiveBrowseComp: Are Search Agents Searching, or Just Verifying What They Already Know?cited by 3
- 2026Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanismscited by 3
- 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026Distributed General-Purpose Agent Networks: Architecture, Key Mechanisms, and Prototypescited by 3
- 2026Don't Blindly Trust It: How Unreliable Feedback Breaks Tool-Using LLM Agentscited by 3
- 2026Governance Gaps in Agent Interoperability Protocols: What MCP, A2A, and ACP Cannot Expresscited by 3
- 2026DynaTrust: Defending Multi-Agent Systems Against Sleeper Agents via Dynamic Trust Graphscited by 2
- 2026Knowing but Not Correcting: Routine Task Requests Suppress Factual Correction in LLMscited by 2
- 2026Hidden Anchors in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberationcited by 2
- 2026Why LLMs Give In: Conversational Factors and Reasoning Behind Medical Sycophancycited by 2
- 2026AnchorBench: A Multi-Pathway Benchmark for the Anchoring Effect in LLMscited by 2
- 2024Social Deliberation vs. Social Contracts in Self-Governing Voluntary Organisationscited by 1
- 2026Cooperation in Human and Machine Agents: Promise Theory Considerationscited by 1
- 2026ClawNet: Human-Symbiotic Agent Network for Cross-User Autonomous Cooperationcited by 1
- 2026Bias by Necessity: Impossibility Theorems for Sequential Processing with Convergent AI and Human Validationcited by 1
- 2026Evaluating Commercial AI Chatbots as News Intermediariescited by 1
- 2026A Technical Taxonomy of LLM Agent Communication Protocolscited by 1
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.