Less Is Moral: A CHARMing Framework for Moral Foundations Detection in Endorsement Behaviour
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Moral language plays a central role in shaping online endorsement and the diffusion of information, yet existing moral foundation detection systems often suffer from poor cross-domain generalization, weak rationale grounding, and reliance on costly prompting-based large language models (LLMs). We introduce CHARM, a MAC- and Hate-speech-Aware Rationalealigned Moral foundation detection framework built on a lightweight fine-tuned LLM, which integrates complementary moral grounding, rationale alignment, and polarity-aware hate speech signals to support more robust and faithful moral prediction. Unlike prior dictionary-, fine-tune-, or prompt-based detectors, which decouple computation from psychological theory, CHARM is built so that each component -- MAC cross-attention, rationale alignment, and hate-speech modulation -- operationalizes a distinct psychological construct. Using a 30% subsample of the MFTC, MFRC, and News training pools together with the richer supervision in MFTCXplain, CHARM improves AUC by up to 15.3% in-domain, surpasses the supervised baselines on every out-of-domain dataset in both AUC and F1, and offers a scalable, low-cost alternative to prompting-based LLM detectors. We further apply CHARM to large-scale COVID-19 discourse on Twitter and show that moral value alignment is strongly associated with online endorsement behavior. By making moral framing measurable at scale, CHARM offers a practical tool for studying the spread of morally charged misinformation. Code and additional materials: https://github.com/HuixiangF/CHARM/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 253
- 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 129
- 2022The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systemscited by 92
- 2024MoralBERT: A Fine-Tuned Language Model for Capturing Moral Values in Social Discussionscited by 23
- 2023A Data Fusion Framework for Multi-Domain Morality Learningcited by 14
- 2024As an AI Language Model, "Yes I Would Recommend Calling the Police": Norm Inconsistency in LLM Decision-Makingcited by 10
- 2025MFTCXplain: A Multilingual Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating the Moral Reasoning of LLMs through Multi-hop Hate Speech Explanationcited by 7
- 2025MoVa: Towards Generalizable Classification of Human Morals and Valuescited by 7
- 2022LibertyMFD: A Lexicon to Assess the Moral Foundation of Libertycited by 5
2 more
- 2026Self-Explaining Hate Speech Detection with Moral Rationalescited by 5
- 2025The Moral Gap of Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.